Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32129573›Full record

ArticleCatheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions2020

Contemporary trends and outcomes in aortic valve replacement in patients with end-stage liver disease.

Muhammad Z Khan, Muhammad U Khan, Muhammad Bilal Munir, Safi U Khan, Mohammed Osman, Sudarshan Balla

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cardiology Assessment of Patients Undergoing Evaluation for Orthotopic Liver Transplantation.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Muhammad Z KhanDepartment of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8473-8069
Muhammad U KhanDepartment of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Muhammad Bilal MunirDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, West Virginia University Heart & Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9804-898X
Safi U KhanDepartment of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1559-6911
Mohammed OsmanDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, West Virginia University Heart & Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Sudarshan BallaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, West Virginia University Heart & Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
West Virginia University · US

Funding

West Virginia IDEA-CTRU54GM104942 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Sally Lynn Hodder · 2012 to 2026
$81.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEven in high-risk trials pertaining to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) have been under-represented. We sought to study this population group from a large national United States population database.

methodsWe used National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from January 2005 to August 2015. Patients with ESLD were extracted using Goldberg's algorithm. Propensity match analysis was done for comparative analysis between surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and TAVR groups. Logistic regression analysis was used for predictors of in-hospital mortality.

resultsOut of 309,959 ESLD patients, 1,375 underwent aortic valve replacement and 1,199 patients were included in our study. Mean age was 66.1 (SD, 9.1) years. In matched data, the in-hospital mortality was 5.5% in TAVR group when compared to 19.4% in SAVR group. Ventilator use (16.1 vs. 27.2%, p < .01), tracheostomy (<4 vs. 7.2%, p < .01), and vasopressin use (0 vs. 7.4%, p < .01) were utilized less in TAVR group as compared to SAVR group. The proportion of TAVR has increased from almost zero in 2011 to 51.3% in 2015. Mean cost for hospital stay has increased in SAVR group (from 254,427$ in 2005 to 321,791$ in 2015, p < .01). Similarly, a large decrease in length of stay has been observed for TAVR group (14.5 days in 2011 to 5.4 days in 2015, p < .01). TAVR (odds ratios [OR]: 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20-0.87, p = .02) was associated with lower in-hospital mortality.

conclusionTAVR was associated with lower in-hospital mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization in high-risk ESLD patients.

Indexed as

End Stage Liver DiseaseHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAgedAortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisDatabases, FactualFemaleHeart Valve ProsthesisHospital MortalityHumansInpatientsLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative Complicationsend-stage liver diseaseoutcomessurgical aortic valve replacementtranscatheter aortic valve replacement

Identifiers

PMID32129573
PMCPMC7484033
OpenAlexW3009320682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.