Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32129438›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2021

De-escalation of Empiric Antibiotics Following Negative Cultures in Hospitalized Patients With Pneumonia: Rates and Outcomes.

Abhishek Deshpande, Sandra S Richter, Sarah Haessler, Peter K Lindenauer, Pei-Chun Yu, Marya D Zilberberg, Peter B Imrey, Thomas Higgins, Michael B Rothberg

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05568654 (Reducing Antimicrobial Overuse Through Targeted Therapy for Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05568654 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Reducing Antimicrobial Overuse Through Targeted Therapy for Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Cleveland ClinicRan2022 to 2026Enrolled28,580ConditionsCommunity-Acquired Pneumonia, Antimicrobial Stewardship, Point-of-Care TestingArmsRapid Diagnostic Testing, Pharmacist-led de-escalation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Antibiotic de-escalation patterns and outcomes in critically ill patients with suspected pneumonia as informed by bronchoalveolar lavage results.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Epidemiology and Outcomes of Antibiotic De-escalation in Patients With Suspected Sepsis in US Hospitals.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Initial antimicrobial management of sepsis.Critical care (London, England) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Abhishek DeshpandeCenter for Value-Based Care Research, Cleveland Clinic Community Care, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Sandra S RichterDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Pathology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Sarah HaesslerDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, Massachusetts, USA.
Peter K LindenauerInstitute for Healthcare Delivery and Population Science and Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, Massachusetts, USA.
Pei-Chun YuDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Marya D ZilberbergUniversity of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.
Peter B ImreyDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Thomas HigginsCenter for Case Management, Natick, Massachusetts, USA.
Michael B RothbergCenter for Value-Based Care Research, Cleveland Clinic Community Care, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Funding

Reducing Antimicrobial Overuse in HCAP Through Personalized Antimicrobial RecommendationsR01HS024277 · AHRQ · CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION · PI ROTHBERG, MICHAEL B · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
Using Large Observational Datasets to Improve Antibiotic Prescribing for Community-Acquired PneumoniaK08HS025026 · AHRQ · CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION · PI DESHPANDE, ABHISHEK · 2016 to 2020
$697k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS025026AHRQ HHS R01 HS024277
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor patients at risk for multidrug-resistant organisms, IDSA/ATS guidelines recommend empiric therapy against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas. Following negative cultures, the guidelines recommend antimicrobial de-escalation. We assessed antibiotic de-escalation practices across hospitals and their associations with outcomes in hospitalized patients with pneumonia with negative cultures.

methodsWe included adults admitted with pneumonia in 2010-2015 to 164 US hospitals if they had negative blood and/or respiratory cultures and received both anti-MRSA and antipseudomonal agents other than quinolones. De-escalation was defined as stopping both empiric drugs on day 4 while continuing another antibiotic. Patients were propensity adjusted for de-escalation and compared on in-hospital 14-day mortality, late deterioration (ICU transfer), length-of-stay (LOS), and costs. We also compared adjusted outcomes across hospital de-escalation rate quartiles.

resultsOf 14 170 patients, 1924 (13%) had both initial empiric drugs stopped by hospital day 4. Hospital de-escalation rates ranged from 2-35% and hospital de-escalation rate quartile was not significantly associated with outcomes. At hospitals in the top quartile of de-escalation, even among patients at lowest risk for mortality, the de-escalation rates were <50%. In propensity-adjusted analysis, patients with de-escalation had lower odds of subsequent transfer to ICU (adjusted odds ratio, .38; 95% CI, .18-.79), LOS (adjusted ratio of means, .76; .75-.78), and costs (.74; .72-.76).

conclusionsA minority of eligible patients with pneumonia had antibiotics de-escalated by hospital day 4 following negative cultures and de-escalation rates varied widely between hospitals. To adhere to recent guidelines will require substantial changes in practice.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusPneumoniaAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsHospital MortalityHumansRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agentsantimicrobial stewardshipcommunity-acquired pneumoniade-escalationnegative cultures

Identifiers

PMID32129438
PMCPMC7901260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.