Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32128966›Full record

ArticleLiver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society2020

Addition of [

Binu V John, Sean Aubuchon, Bassam Dahman, Venkata Rajesh Konjeti, Douglas Heuman, Jennifer Hubert, Smitha Thomas, Yangyang Deng, Cynthia Solomon, Latha Thankam Sundaram and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07019844 (Addition of F18-Piflufolastat PET/CT to Cross-Sectional Imaging for the Staging and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07019844 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Addition of F18-Piflufolastat PET/CT to Cross-Sectional Imaging for the Staging and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

TypeobservationalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2024 to 2028Enrolled90ConditionsHepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Prognostic Value ofCancers · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Impact of theJournal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. INASL Consensus on Management of HCC: Navigating an Evolving Field.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Binu V JohnDepartment of Hepatology, Miami Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Miami, FL.
Sean AubuchonVirginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA.
Bassam DahmanDepartments of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
Venkata Rajesh KonjetiDepartment of Hospital Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
Douglas HeumanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Richmond, VA.
Jennifer HubertDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Richmond, VA.
Smitha ThomasDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Richmond, VA.
Yangyang DengDepartments of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
Cynthia SolomonDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Richmond, VA.
Latha Thankam SundaramDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Richmond, VA.
Eleanor LoveVirginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA.
Amit G SingalDivision of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
James L TatumDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Richmond, VA.
Virginia Commonwealth University · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USVeterans Health Administration · USVirginia Commonwealth University Medical Center · US

Funding

Virus Vector Shared ResourceP30CA016059 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI Kim Felder Rhoads · 1985 to 2026
$51.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, we characterize the value of positron emission tomography (PET) with computed tomography (CT) in combination with cross-sectional imaging for staging and prognostication of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. In this retrospective cohort study, HCC patients underwent PET-CT after initial staging with contrast-enhanced CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The benefit of PET-CT was measured by the identification of new HCC lesions, and potential harm was quantified by the number of false positives and subsequent diagnostic evaluation. We used multivariate Cox regression analysis to evaluate the association between the highest grade on PET-CT with the risk of extrahepatic metastasis, progression-free, and overall survival. Among 148 patients, PET-CT detected additional extrahepatic metastasis in 11.9% of treatment-naïve and 13.8% of treatment-experienced patients. PET-CT changed the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging in 5.9% of treatment-naïve and 18.8% of treatment-experienced patients compared with CT/MRI alone, changing HCC management in 9.9% and 21.3% of patients, respectively. Of the patients, 5% (n = 8) experienced severe physical harm requiring additional procedures to evaluate extrahepatic findings. High tumor grade on PET-CT was independently associated with a higher likelihood of extrahepatic metastasis (hazard ratio [HR], 17.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.6-81.5) and worse overall survival (HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.4-4.3). Treatment-experienced patients (versus treatment-naïve patients; HR, 9.7; 95% CI, 1.9-49.4) and BCLC stage A (HR, 8.2; 95% CI, 1.5-45.9; P < 0.01) and BCLC stage B (HR, 20.6; 95% CI, 1.5-282.2; P < 0.05) were more likely to have an upstaging with PET-CT compared with BCLC stage C (reference). PET-CT provides prognostic information and improves tumor staging beyond CT/MRI alone, with subsequent changes in management for patients with HCC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsLiver TransplantationFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansNeoplasm StagingPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID32128966
PMCPMC8006185
OpenAlexW3010308930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.