ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2020
Data-Driven Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Using Loss Adaptive Dipole Inversion (LADI).
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of the sample size used in clinical MRI studies.PloS one · 2025Article
- Quantitative susceptibility mapping using plug-and-play alternating direction method of multipliers.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Magnetic susceptibility and R2* of myocardial reperfusion injury at 3T and 7T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundQuantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) uses prior information to reconstruct maps, but prior information may not show pathology and introduce inconsistencies with susceptibility maps, degrade image quality and inadvertently smoothing image features. PURPOSE: To develop a local field data-driven QSM reconstruction that does not depend on spatial edge prior information. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SUBJECTS, ANIMAL MODELS: A dataset from 2016 ISMRM QSM Challenge, 11 patients with glioblastoma, a patient with microbleeds and porcine heart. SEQUENCE/FIELD STRENGTH: 3D gradient echo sequence on 3T and 7T scanners. ASSESSMENT: Accuracy was compared to Calculation of Susceptibility through Multiple Orientation Sampling (COSMOS), and several published techniques using region of interest (ROI) measurements, root-mean-squared error (RMSE), structural similarity index metric (SSIM), and high-frequency error norm (HFEN). Numerical ranking and semiquantitative image grading was performed by three expert observers to assess overall image quality (IQ) and image sharpness (IS). STATISTICAL TESTS: Bland-Altman, Friedman test, and Conover multiple comparisons.
resultsLoss adaptive dipole inversion (LADI) (β = 0.82, R
conclusionFor neuroimaging applications, LADI preserved image sharpness and fine features in glioblastoma and microbleed patients. LADI performed better at mitigating artifacts in cardiac QSM. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:823-835.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.