Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32128722›Full record

Observational studyCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2020

Accuracy of the Clinical Frailty Scale for perioperative frailty screening: a prospective observational study.

Jai N Darvall, Joel Loth, Tony Bose, Sabine Braat, Anurika De Silva, David A Story, Wen K Lim

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04783662 (Study of an Intraoperative Frontal Electroencephalographic Marker of Preoperative Frailty in Patients Over 65 Years of Age for Elective Non-cardiac Surgery.), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04783662 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Study of an Intraoperative Frontal Electroencephalographic Marker of Preoperative Frailty in Patients Over 65 Years of Age for Elective Non-cardiac Surgery.

TypeobservationalSponsorPontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileRan2021 to 2022Enrolled60ConditionsFrailtyArmsIntraoperative frontal electroencephalogram
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Interrater reliability of the Clinical Frailty Scale in the anesthesia preadmission clinic.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Prevalence and associated factors of frailty and sarcopenia in multiple system atrophy and progressive supranuclear palsy: a cross-sectional study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jai N DarvallDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. jai.darvall@mh.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0579-8931
Joel LothDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Tony BoseDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Sabine BraatCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Melbourne Clinical and Translational Science Platform, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Anurika De SilvaCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Melbourne Clinical and Translational Science Platform, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
David A StoryCentre for Integrated Critical Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Wen K LimDepartment of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePerioperative frailty increases postoperative complications, mortality, and new functional dependence. Despite this, routine perioperative frailty screening is not widespread. We aimed to assess the accuracy of the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) as a screening tool prior to anesthesia, and to determine which health domains are affected by frailty.

methodsIn a prospective, single-centre observational study, we enrolled 218 patients aged ≥ 65 yr undergoing elective and emergency surgery. The screening performance of the CFS was compared with the Edmonton Frail Scale, including the effect in individual frailty domains, and outcomes including discharge location and mortality.

resultsThe median [interquartile range] age of the enrolled subjects was 74 [69-80] yr and 24% of the patients were frail. The CFS and Edmonton scales were highly correlated (Spearman correlation coefficient, 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 0.86), and in substantial agreement (kappa coefficient, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.81), with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.86 to 0.94) indicating excellent discrimination for the CFS in predicting frailty status based on the Edmonton scale. Frail patients had higher 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 5.26; 95% CI, 1.28 to 21.62), and were less likely to be discharged home. Frail patients had poorer health throughout frailty domains, including functional dependence (42% of frail vs 4% of non-frail patients; P < 0.001), malnutrition (48% vs 19%, P < 0.001), and poor physical performance (47% vs 7%, P < 0.001).

conclusionThe CFS is a valid and accurate tool to screen for perioperative frailty, which encompasses the spectrum of health-related domains.

Indexed as

FrailtyAgedFrail ElderlyHumansPatient DischargeProspective StudiesROC Curve

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.