ArticleHepatology international2020
The effectiveness and safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in chronic hepatitis C patients with refractory factors in the real world: a comprehensive analysis of a prospective multicenter study.
Article in Hepatology international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-world effectiveness of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir against genotype 3 hepatitis C virus infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- Drug-induced liver injury by glecaprevir/pibrentasvir treatment for chronic hepatitis C infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir in HCV Patients With Previous Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy Failures: A Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Nationwide Socioeconomic Evaluation of Direct-Acting Antivirals for Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Japan Between 2014 and 2023.Journal of viral hepatitis · 2026Article
- Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy and Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Captive Chimpanzees With Long-Standing Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection.Journal of medical virology · 2026Article
- The Efficacy of Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir in Chronic Hepatitis C Patients and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multicenter Real-Life Data.Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology · 2024Article
- ALBI score predicts morphological changes in esophageal varices following direct-acting antiviral-induced sustained virological response in patients with liver cirrhosis.Journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
- A single site study to investigate the current prevalence of anti-hepatitis C virus antibody among substance use disorder patients in Hiroshima-Insufficient testing and diagnosis.Neuropsychopharmacology reports · 2023Article
- The care cascade for hepatitis C virus and prognosis of chronic hepatitis C patients treated with antiviral agents in a tertiary hospital.BMC gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Risk Factors of Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir-Induced Liver Injury and Efficacy of Ursodeoxycholic Acid.Viruses · 2023Article
- A Systematic Review of Direct-Acting Antivirals for Hepatitis C in Advanced CKD.Kidney international reports · 2023Article
- Effectiveness and Safety of Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir/Voxilaprevir as a Hepatitis C Virus Infection Salvage Therapy in the Real World: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2022Article
- Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging predicts hyperbilirubinemia induced by glecaprevir during hepatitis C virus treatment.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- A cost-effectiveness study of universal screening for hepatitis C virus infection in South Korea: A societal perspective.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2022Article
- Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir Plus Ribavirin Combination Therapy for Patients with Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1a, 2a, or 3b after Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir Therapy Failed.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2021Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir in Patients with Chronic HCV Infection.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2021Review
- Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment for Hepatitis C Genotypes Uncommon in High-Income Countries: A Dutch Nationwide Cohort Study.Open forum infectious diseases · 2021Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir for Chronic Hepatitis C Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2020Article
- Selection dynamics of HCV genotype 3 resistance-associated substitutions under direct-acting antiviral therapy pressure.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious DiseasesArticle
- Successful Retreatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1A Infection With Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir in a Pediatric Patient With Developmental Disorder.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
39 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDirect-acting anti-virals (DAAs) have markedly improved the effectiveness of anti-viral therapy for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients. In a phase III trial in Japan, treatment with the NS3/4A protease inhibitor glecaprevir and the NS5A inhibitor pibrentasvir (G/P) resulted in a small number of patients with refractory factors. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of G/P, especially among patients with these refractory factors, and the influence of these factors on treatment.
methodsIn a prospective, multicenter study involving 33 medical institutions, 1439 patients were treated with G/P, and their efficacy, safety, and most frequent adverse effects (AEs) were analyzed.
resultsOverall SVR12 rates were 99.1% (1397/1410) in the per-protocol-analysis, and genotype sustained virologic response SVR12 rates were: genotype 1, 99.4% (707/711); genotype 2, 99.4% (670/674); genotype 3, 80.0% (16/20). DAA-naïve patients (p = 0.008) with HCV genotype except 3 (genotype 1 vs. 3, p = 2.68 × 10
conclusionsG/P regimen is highly effective and safe to treat CHC patients even with refractory factors such as CKD and advanced liver fibrosis. However, patients with past experience of IFN-free DAA treatment and genotype 3, CKD stage 4 or 5, and advanced liver fibrosis should be more closely observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.