Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32128696›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2020

SNAFU: The Semantic Network and Fluency Utility.

Jeffrey C Zemla, Kesong Cao, Kimberly D Mueller, Joseph L Austerweil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Lexical Search and Retrieval in Aphasia: A Computational Analysis of Semantic Fluency.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Spontaneous eye movements reflect the representational geometries of conceptual spaces.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jeffrey C ZemlaDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1202 West Johnson Street, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. zemla@wisc.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7334-4961
Kesong CaoDepartment of Computer Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1210 West Dayton Street, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
Kimberly D MuellerDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Wisconsin Alzheimer's Institute, and Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1975 Willow Drive, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
Joseph L AusterweilDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1202 West Johnson Street, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.

Funding

Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention: Sex Differences in DNA MethylationR01AG027161 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Nathaniel Ark Chin, Sterling C Johnson · 2007 to 2026
$35.6M
Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG062715 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Barbara Brigitta Bendlin · 2019 to 2026
$34.5M
Research Training for Computation and Informatics in Biology and MedicineT15LM007359 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Mark W. Craven, Colin Noel Dewey · 2002 to 2026
$22.6M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062715NIA NIH HHS R01 AG027161NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The verbal fluency task-listing words from a category or words that begin with a specific letter-is a common experimental paradigm that is used to diagnose memory impairments and to understand how we store and retrieve knowledge. Data from the verbal fluency task are analyzed in many different ways, often requiring manual coding that is time intensive and error-prone. Researchers have also used fluency data from groups or individuals to estimate semantic networks-latent representations of semantic memory that describe the relations between concepts-that further our understanding of how knowledge is encoded. However computational methods used to estimate networks are not standardized and can be difficult to implement, which has hindered widespread adoption. We present SNAFU: the Semantic Network and Fluency Utility, a tool for estimating networks from fluency data and automatizing traditional fluency analyses, including counting cluster switches and cluster sizes, intrusions, perseverations, and word frequencies. In this manuscript, we provide a primer on using the tool, illustrate its application by creating a semantic network for foods, and validate the tool by comparing results to trained human coders using multiple datasets.

Indexed as

SemanticsSemantic WebVerbal BehaviorHumansMemoryNeuropsychological TestsMemory retrievalMethodologySemantic networksVerbal fluency

Identifiers

PMID32128696
PMCPMC7406526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.