Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32128468›Full record

ReviewNon-coding RNA research2020

Single nucleotide alterations in MicroRNAs and human cancer-A not fully explored field.

Dan Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Non-coding RNA research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Practical immunomodulatory landscape of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) therapy.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2024
    Review
  2. Glioblastoma Therapy: Past, Present and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. An Insight into miR-1290: An Oncogenic miRNA with Diagnostic Potential.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. MicroRNAs and Cancer Racial Disparities.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dan ZhaoDepartment of Genetics and Cell Biology, Nankai University School of Life Sciences, Tianjin, 300071, China.
Nankai University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MicroRNAs are ~20 nt long small noncoding RNAs that are processed from stem-looped precursors and function mainly as posttranscriptional regulators of protein coding genes through binding to 3'-untranslated regions of messenger RNAs to inhibit the translation or cause RNA degradation. It is predicted microRNAs could regulate up to half of all human genes and are proved to play important roles in human diseases including cancer. They bind to target mRNAs based on complementary binding which is dominated by the so-called "seed" region which are the 5' 2-8 bases of the microRNA. Due to the small size in nature, even a single nucleotide variation in the precursor region especially those located in the seed regions could show big influence. Here, I summarized and reviewed the current knowledge of these single nucleotide alterations in microRNAs in human cancer including (i) common SNPs in the precursor region, (ii) isomiRs, (iii) somatic mutations of microRNAs. Briefly, this is an underexploited field and clearly, warrants further studies to reveal their biological and clinical significances. I believe they will be key to advancing personalized medicine.

Indexed as

IsomirsmicroRNAsSingle nucleotide alterationsSNPsSomatic mutations

Identifiers

PMID32128468
PMCPMC7044681
OpenAlexW3008420094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.