Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32128436›Full record

ReviewLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2020

Automated assessment of psychiatric disorders using speech: A systematic review.

Daniel M Low, Kate H Bentley, Satrajit S Ghosh

5 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 209 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
209citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05455905 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Voice Biomarkers Predictive of Depression and Anxiety: An Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorKintsugi Mindful Wellness, Inc.Ran2021 to 2022Enrolled19,533ConditionsDepression, Anxiety, Healthy, Mental Health Wellness 1ArmsPatient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale
NCT05554042 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Kintsugi Voice Device Study

TypeobservationalSponsorKintsugi Mindful Wellness, Inc.Ran2022 to 2023Enrolled132ConditionsDepression, AnxietyArmsKintsugi Voice Device
NCT06138301 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Digital Interventions for Social isOLation In youThs And theIR familiEs

TypeinterventionalSponsorAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata VeronaRan2023 to 2025Enrolled80ConditionsSocial Isolation, Psychosocial ProblemArmsCognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Cognitive Remediation (CR)
NCT06374056 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Kintsugi Voice Device SCID-5-CT Pilot Study

TypeobservationalSponsorKintsugi Mindful Wellness, Inc.Ran2024 to 2026Enrolled262ConditionsDepression, Depression Moderate, Depression Severe, Depression MildArmsKintsugi Voice Device
NCT06544226 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Novel Pilot Study Examining the Potential of Smartphones to Capture New Types of Data That Can Accurately Assess the Physiological and Psychological Health Status of an Individual With an Eating Disorder

TypeobservationalSponsorUniva HealthRan2024 to 2025Enrolled130ConditionsEating DisordersArmsUH100
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

209 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. The Fundamental Frequency of Voice as a Potential Stress Biomarker: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress · 2025
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Speech markers of psychological change following a psychedelic 5-MeO-DMT retreat.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article

149 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel M LowProgram in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8866-8667
Kate H BentleyDepartment of Psychiatry Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts.
Satrajit S GhoshProgram in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5312-6729

Funding

TRAINING FOR SPEECH AND HEARING SCIENCEST32DC000038 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Gwenaelle S Geleoc · 1992 to 2026
$21.8M
Resource DiscoveryP41EB019936 · NIBIB · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI David Nelson Kennedy · 2016 to 2026
$15.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB019936NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThere are many barriers to accessing mental health assessments including cost and stigma. Even when individuals receive professional care, assessments are intermittent and may be limited partly due to the episodic nature of psychiatric symptoms. Therefore, machine-learning technology using speech samples obtained in the clinic or remotely could one day be a biomarker to improve diagnosis and treatment. To date, reviews have only focused on using acoustic features from speech to detect depression and schizophrenia. Here, we present the first systematic review of studies using speech for automated assessments across a broader range of psychiatric disorders.

methodsWe followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. We included studies from the last 10 years using speech to identify the presence or severity of disorders within the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). For each study, we describe sample size, clinical evaluation method, speech-eliciting tasks, machine learning methodology, performance, and other relevant findings.

results1395 studies were screened of which 127 studies met the inclusion criteria. The majority of studies were on depression, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder, and the remaining on post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorders, and eating disorders. 63% of studies built machine learning predictive models, and the remaining 37% performed null-hypothesis testing only. We provide an online database with our search results and synthesize how acoustic features appear in each disorder.

conclusionSpeech processing technology could aid mental health assessments, but there are many obstacles to overcome, especially the need for comprehensive transdiagnostic and longitudinal studies. Given the diverse types of data sets, feature extraction, computational methodologies, and evaluation criteria, we provide guidelines for both acquiring data and building machine learning models with a focus on testing hypotheses, open science, reproducibility, and generalizability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3a.

Indexed as

machine learningmental healthpsychiatryspeechvoice

Identifiers

PMID32128436
PMCPMC7042657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.