Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32128408›Full record

ArticleScience advances2020

Neanderthal-Denisovan ancestors interbred with a distantly related hominin.

Alan R Rogers, Nathan S Harris, Alan A Achenbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Somatic Recombination Between an Ancient and a RecentInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Philosophy and ethics of de-extinction.Cambridge prisms. Extinction · 2023
    Review
  11. Predicting Archaic Hominin Phenotypes from Genomic Data.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Estimating bonobo (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alan R RogersDepartment of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3987-3346
Nathan S HarrisDepartment of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Alan A AchenbachDepartment of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5570-7113

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research has shown that modern Eurasians interbred with their Neanderthal and Denisovan predecessors. We show here that hundreds of thousands of years earlier, the ancestors of Neanderthals and Denisovans interbred with their own Eurasian predecessors-members of a "superarchaic" population that separated from other humans about 2 million years ago. The superarchaic population was large, with an effective size between 20 and 50 thousand individuals. We confirm previous findings that (i) Denisovans also interbred with superarchaics, (ii) Neanderthals and Denisovans separated early in the middle Pleistocene, (iii) their ancestors endured a bottleneck of population size, and (iv) the Neanderthal population was large at first but then declined in size. We provide qualified support for the view that (v) Neanderthals interbred with the ancestors of modern humans.

Indexed as

ConsanguinityAnimalsConfidence IntervalsGene FlowGenetics, PopulationHominidaeModels, GeneticNeanderthalsPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID32128408
PMCPMC7032934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.