ArticleScience advances2019
Reward associations do not explain transitive inference performance in monkeys.
Article in Science advances, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-Neuron Encoding of Learnability in the Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Monkeys (Macaca mulatta) rank lists using multiple cognitive mechanisms simultaneously.Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983) · 2025Article
- Non-human primates can flexibly learn serial sequences and reorder context-dependent object sequences.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Flexible Learning and Re-ordering of Context-dependent Object Sequences in Nonhuman Primates.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Transitive inference in a clinical childhood sample with a focus on autism spectrum disorder.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2024Article
- A geometrical solution underlies general neural principle for serial ordering.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Prior experience modifies acquisition trajectories via response-strategy sampling.Animal cognition · 2023Article
- Resolving the associative learning paradox by category learning in pigeons.Current biology : CB · 2023Article
- Probabilistic reinforcement precludes transitive inference: A preliminary study.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Hippocampal and medial prefrontal cortices encode structural task representations following progressive and interleaved training schedules.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Superstitious learning of abstract order from random reinforcement.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Flexible auditory training, psychophysics, and enrichment of common marmosets with an automated, touchscreen-based system.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Influence of Rule- and Reward-based Strategies on Inferences of Serial Order by Monkeys.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2022Article
- Positional inference in rhesus macaques.Animal cognition · 2022Article
- Transitive inference after minimal training in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition · 2021Article
- Absolute and relative knowledge of ordinal position on implied lists.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2020Article
- Learned Representation of Implied Serial Order in Posterior Parietal Cortex.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Associative models fail to characterize transitive inference performance in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).Learning & behavior · 2020Article
- Discovering Implied Serial Order Through Model-Free and Model-Based Learning.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most accounts of behavior in nonhuman animals assume that they make choices to maximize expected reward value. However, model-free reinforcement learning based on reward associations cannot account for choice behavior in transitive inference paradigms. We manipulated the amount of reward associated with each item of an ordered list, so that maximizing expected reward value was always in conflict with decision rules based on the implicit list order. Under such a schedule, model-free reinforcement algorithms cannot achieve high levels of accuracy, even after extensive training. Monkeys nevertheless learned to make correct rule-based choices. These results show that monkeys' performance in transitive inference paradigms is not driven solely by expected reward and that appropriate inferences are made despite discordant reward incentives. We show that their choices can be explained by an abstract, model-based representation of list order, and we provide a method for inferring the contents of such representations from observed data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.