ArticleJournal of patient experience2020
Patients' and Family Members' Subjective Experiences of a Diagnostic Evaluation of Mild Cognitive Impairment.
Article in Journal of patient experience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nurses' perspectives on barriers to managing risk factors for mild cognitive impairment in older adults using a qualitative descriptive approach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Coping with cognitive decline in older adults with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia: a scoping review.Aging & mental health · 2025Article
- Dilemmas in the usage of community-based home care and smart home care services for older adults among family caregivers of older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI): a qualitative study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Examining the Effects of Formal Education Level on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2022Article
- "Now at least we have something to call it": Patient and care partner experiences receiving an amyloid PET scan.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2022Article
- Conditions required to ensure successful detection and management of mild cognitive impairment in primary care: A Delphi consultation study in China.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Barriers to Self-Care Planning for Family Caregivers of Patients with Severe Mental Illness.Journal of patient experience · 2022Article
- Experiences of Participation in a Multimodal Preventive Trial MIND-ADJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2022Article
- Caregiver identity in care partners of persons living with mild cognitive impairment.Dementia (London, England) · 2021Article
- A Narrative Review of Alzheimer's Disease Stigma.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeople with a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) often struggle with uncertainty and fear when learning of and coping with their diagnosis. However, little is known about their experiences and perspectives, and those of their care partners, when seeking out and undergoing a diagnostic evaluation for their cognitive symptoms.
methodThis study is a secondary analysis of a focus group discussion that was initially conducted to learn the perspectives and experiences of participants and their care partners during a mock disclosure session of brain scan results. Participant's broader views on their experience of completing a cognitive evaluation resulting in an MCI diagnosis were evaluated in this study. Analysis used qualitative content methodology and line-by-line coding which generated categories and themes.
resultsThe (1) "presence of a threat" and (2) attempts to "minimize the threat" emerged as overarching themes driving the process of seeking out a diagnostic evaluation for cognitive symptoms. Subthemes that highlight the complexity of the presence of a threat included the "fear of stigma," and the "emotional reactions" related to an MCI diagnosis. Three additional subthemes represented approaches that participants and their care partners used to minimize threat of MCI: "use of language" to minimize the threat; "information sharing and withholding"; and the "use of social support to legitimize personal experiences."
conclusionThese findings add to the literature by elucidating the uncertainty, fears, and coping strategies that accompany a diagnostic evaluation of MCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.