ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2019
Formal Infectious Diseases Specialist Consultation Improves Long-term Outcome of Methicillin-Sensitive
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of specialty on the self-reported practice of using oral antibiotic therapy for definitive treatment of bloodstream infections.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2023Article
- Incidence and Risk Factors for Inappropriate Use of Non-Culture-Based Fungal Assays: Implication for Diagnostic Stewardship.Open forum infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Infectious diseases specialist consultation in Staphylococcus lugdunensis bacteremia.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFormal infectious diseases specialist (IDS) consultation has been shown to improve short-term outcomes in
methodsThis retrospective study followed 367 methicillin-sensitive (MS) SAB patients for 10 years. The impact of formal IDS consultation on risk for new bacteremia and outcome during long-term follow-up was evaluated. Patients who died within 90 days were excluded to avoid interference from early deceased patients.
resultsThree hundred four (83%) patients had formal IDS consultation, whereas 63 (17%) received informal or no IDS consultation. Formal consultation, compared with informal or lack of consultation, was associated with a reduced risk of new bacteremia caused by any pathogen within 1 year (odds ratio [OR], 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.84;
conclusionsMS-SAB management by formal IDS consultation, compared with informal or lack of IDS consultation, reduces risk for new bacteremia episodes and improves long-term prognosis up to 10 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.