Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32128326›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2019

Rapid Multiplex Testing for Upper Respiratory Pathogens in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Larissa May, Grant Tatro, Eduard Poltavskiy, Benjamin Mooso, Simson Hon, Heejung Bang, Christopher Polage

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02957136 (Randomized Clinical Trial of Multi-respiratory Pathogen Testing Versus Usual Care in Emergency Department), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02957136 nacompletednot on this map

Randomized Clinical Trial of Multi-respiratory Pathogen Testing Versus Usual Care in Emergency Department (ED) Patients With Upper Respiratory Symptoms

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, DavisRan2016 to 2018Enrolled194ConditionsRespiratory Tract Infections, Influenza, Human, Common ColdArmsRapid respiratory pathogen nucleic acid amplification test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Larissa MayDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.
Grant TatroDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.
Eduard PoltavskiyGraduate Group in Epidemiology, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Benjamin MoosoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.
Simson HonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.
Heejung BangGraduate Group in Epidemiology, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Christopher PolageDepartment of Pathology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.
University of California, Davis · USDuke University · US

Funding

UC Davis Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001860 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI KENYON, NICHOLAS J., LYLES, COURTNEY REES · 2016 to 2025
$47.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute upper respiratory tract infections are a common cause of emergency department (ED) visits and often result in unnecessary antibiotic treatment.

methodsWe conducted a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the impact of a rapid, multipathogen respiratory panel (RP) test vs usual care (control). Patients were eligible if they were ≥12 months old, had symptoms of upper respiratory infection or influenza-like illness, and were not on antibiotics. The primary outcome was antibiotic prescription; secondary outcomes included antiviral prescription, disposition, and length of stay (ClinicalTrials.gov# NCT02957136).

resultsOf 191 patients enrolled, 93 (49%) received RP testing; 98 (51%) received usual care. Fifty-three (57%) RP and 7 (7%) control patients had a virus detected and reported during the ED visit (

conclusionsRapid RP testing was associated with a trend toward decreased antibiotic use, suggesting a potential benefit from more rapid viral tests in the ED. Future studies should determine if specific groups are more likely to benefit from testing and evaluate the relative cost and effectiveness of broad testing, focused testing, and a combined diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship approach.

Indexed as

antibiotic treatmentdiagnostic testemergency departmentrandomized clinical trialUpper respiratory tract infection

Identifiers

PMID32128326
PMCPMC7043218
OpenAlexW2988429088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.