Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32128133›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2020

Host population genetics and biogeography structure the microbiome of the sponge

Cole G Easson, Andia Chaves-Fonnegra, Robert W Thacker, Jose V Lopez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Stability of the Microbiome of the SpongeFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  18. Host specificity of the gut microbiome.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2021
    Review
  19. The Culturable Mycobiome of MesophoticJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cole G EassonDepartment of Biology Middle Tennessee State University Murfreesboro TN.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3845-8426
Andia Chaves-FonnegraHarriet L. Wilkes Honors College Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute Florida Atlantic University Fort Pierce FL.
Robert W ThackerDepartment of Ecology and Evolution Stony Brook University Stony Brook NY.
Jose V LopezHalmos College of Natural Sciences and Oceanography Nova Southeastern University Dania Beach FL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sponges occur across diverse marine biomes and host internal microbial communities that can provide critical ecological functions. While strong patterns of host specificity have been observed consistently in sponge microbiomes, the precise ecological relationships between hosts and their symbiotic microbial communities remain to be fully delineated. In the current study, we investigate the relative roles of host population genetics and biogeography in structuring the microbial communities hosted by the excavating sponge

Indexed as

Cliona delitrixmicrobiomepopulation geneticsporifera

Identifiers

PMID32128133
PMCPMC7042757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.