Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32128075›Full record

ReviewJournal of market access & health policy2020

How to assess for the full economic value of vaccines? From past to present, drawing lessons for the future.

Baudouin Standaert, Christophe Sauboin, Rodrigo DeAntonio, Alen Marijam, Jorge Gomez, Lijoy Varghese, Sharon Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of market access & health policy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Unlocking herpes zoster vaccination value in Finland: return on investment and actuarial model.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Discounting health gain: a different view.Journal of market access & health policy · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Baudouin StandaertHealth Economics, GSK, Wavre, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6801-9654
Christophe SauboinValue Evidence, GSK, Wavre, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0913-039X
Rodrigo DeAntonioR&D Health Outcomes Latin America, GSK, Panama City, Panama.ORCID 0000-0003-2586-4115
Alen MarijamValue Evidence and Outcome, GSK, Collegeville, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1046-9702
Jorge GomezR&D Health Outcomes, GSK, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0001-5459-4973
Lijoy VargheseRegional Health Outcomes, GSK, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-6036-424X
Sharon ZhangRegional Health Outcomes, GSK, Singapore, Singapore.
GlaxoSmithKline (Belgium) · BEMinistry of Health · SGGlaxoSmithKline (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Economic evaluationoutcome measurestakeholdervaccine

Identifiers

PMID32128075
PMCPMC7034472
OpenAlexW3004021706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.