Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32127859›Full record

ArticleAfrican health sciences2019

Tear electrolyte assessment of diabetic patients in Southern Nigeria.

Juno Okukpon, Oziegbe Okukpon

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African health sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Juno OkukponUniversity of Benin, Department of Optometry; Applied Environmental Bioscience and Public Health Research Group, Life Sciences, University of Benin.
Oziegbe OkukponOkukpon, Oziegbe; Irrua specialist teaching hospital, Department of Community Medicine.
Irrua Specialist Teaching Hospital · NGUniversity of Benin · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTears are a critical body extracellular fluid coating the surface epithelial cells of the cornea and conjunctiva, and providing the optically smooth surface necessary for refraction of light onto the retina. The biological and chemical properties of tears change in response to systemic disease.

objectivesThis study assessed the concentration of calcium, magnesium and phosphate levels in tears of diabetics.

methodsA comparative cross-sectional study involving twenty diabetics visiting Department for Health Services, University of Benin and forty non-diabetics within the University between 35 to 65 years participated in the study. Calcium, magnesium and phosphorous were analysed in tears sample collected with 75mm glass capillary tubes.

resultsThe fasting blood sugar (FBS) and age of diabetic patients was 7.48±1.88mmol/l and 56.75±5.82years and non-diabetics was 4.83±0.52mmol/l and 53.58±6.16years respectively. Magnesium showed no differences (P<0.05) between diabetics (0.76±0.45mmol/l) and non-diabetics (0.93±0.59mmol/l). Calcium was elevated (P=0.041) and phosphate (P=0.044) was decreased in diabetics (3.14±1.65mmol/l and 0.074±0.058mmol/l) than non-diabetics (2.41±1.05mmol/l and 0.11±0.081mmol/l).

conclusionThis study concluded that being diabetic can affect the levels of some tear electrolytes in the tear fluid which may lead to an increased risk of diabetic ocular complications.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkersCalciumCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansMagnesiumMaleMiddle AgedNigeriaPhosphorusTearsBiomarkersCalciumMagnesiumPhosphoruscalciumdiabeticsmag nesiumphosphorusTears

Identifiers

PMID32127859
PMCPMC7040349
OpenAlexW3000172403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.