Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32127690›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2020

Beyond broad strokes: sociocultural insights from the study of ancient genomes.

Fernando Racimo, Martin Sikora, Marc Vander Linden, Hannes Schroeder, Carles Lalueza-Fox

Open access · greenAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Toward an evolutionary ecology of (in)equality.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Human DNA from a prehistoric artefact.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Fernando RacimoGlobe Institute, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. fracimo@sund.ku.dk.
Martin SikoraGlobe Institute, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marc Vander LindenDepartment of Archaeology, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
Hannes SchroederGlobe Institute, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6743-0270
Carles Lalueza-FoxInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain. carles.lalueza@upf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1730-5914
University of Copenhagen · DKInstitut de Biologia Evolutiva · ESUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the field of human history, ancient DNA has provided answers to long-standing debates about major movements of people and has begun to inform on other important facets of the human experience. The field is now moving from mostly large-scale supraregional studies to a more local perspective, shedding light on socioeconomic processes, inheritance rules, marriage practices and technological diffusion. In this Review, we summarize recent studies showcasing these types of insights, focusing on methods used to infer sociocultural aspects of human behaviour. This approach often involves working across disciplines - such as anthropology, archaeology, linguistics and genetics - that have until recently evolved in separation. Multidisciplinary dialogue is important for an integrated reconstruction of human history, which can yield extraordinary insights about past societies, reproductive behaviours and even lifestyle habits that would not be possible to obtain otherwise.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyDNA, AncientEmigration and ImmigrationGenetics, PopulationHistory, AncientHumansMetagenomicsSocioeconomic FactorsDNA, Ancient

Identifiers

PMID32127690
OpenAlexW2988592016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.