ArticleScientific reports2020
An atlas of evidence-based phenotypic associations across the mouse phenome.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Asian Mouse Mutagenesis Resource Association (AMMRA): mouse genetics and laboratory animal resources in the Asia Pacific.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2022Review
- Establishment and application of information resource of mutant mice in RIKEN BioResource Research Center.Laboratory animal research · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To date, reliable relationships between mammalian phenotypes, based on diagnostic test measurements, have not been reported on a large scale. The purpose of this study was to present a large mouse phenotype-phenotype relationships dataset as a reference resource, alongside detailed evaluation of the resource. We used bias-minimized comprehensive mouse phenotype data and applied association rule mining to a dataset consisting of only binary (normal and abnormal phenotypes) data to determine relationships among phenotypes. We present 3,686 evidence-based significant associations, comprising 345 phenotypes covering 60 biological systems (functions), and evaluate their characteristics in detail. To evaluate the relationships, we defined a set of phenotype-phenotype association pairs (PPAPs) as a module of phenotypic expression for each of the 345 phenotypes. By analyzing each PPAP, we identified phenotype sub-networks consisting of the largest numbers of phenotypes and distinct biological systems. Furthermore, using hierarchical clustering based on phenotype similarities among the 345 PPAPs, we identified seven community types within a putative phenome-wide association network. Moreover, to promote leverage of these data, we developed and published web-application tools. These mouse phenome-wide phenotype-phenotype association data reveal general principles of relationships among mammalian phenotypes and provide a reference resource for biomedical analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.