Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32127578›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Modification of an Anopheles gambiae odorant binding protein to create an array of chemical sensors for detection of drugs.

Khasim Cali, Krishna C Persaud

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Artificial Olfactory Biohybrid System: An Evolving Sense of Smell.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  4. Interpol Review of Drug Analysis 2019-2022.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Olfactory systems across mosquito species.Cell and tissue research · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Khasim CaliDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Science, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2017-6922
Krishna C PersaudDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Science, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. krishna.persaud@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5730-9568
University of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The binding pockets of odorant binding proteins from Anopheles gambiae (OBP1 and OBP47) were analysed using in silico modelling. The feasibility of creating mutant proteins to achieve a protein array capable of detecting drugs of abuse in solution or in vapour phase was investigated. OBP1 was found to be easily adapted and several mutant proteins were expressed and characterised. AgamOBP1_S82P was found to have high affinities to cannabinol, 3,4-methylenedioxy methamphetamine (MDMA/Ecstasy) and cocaine hydrochloride. When these proteins were immobilised on a quartz crystal microbalance, saturated cocaine hydrochloride vapour could be detected. The sensors were stable over a period of at least 10 months in air. The approach taken allows flexible design of new biosensors based on inherently stable protein scaffolds taking advantage of the tertiary structure of odorant binding proteins.

Indexed as

AnophelesModels, MolecularAnimalsBinding SitesBiosensing TechniquesComputer SimulationInsect ProteinsMutagenesis, Site-DirectedProtein ConformationReceptors, OdorantSubstance-Related DisordersVolatilizationInsect Proteinsodorant-binding proteinReceptors, Odorant

Identifiers

PMID32127578
PMCPMC7054253
OpenAlexW3009423071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.