Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32127523›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Kea show three signatures of domain-general statistical inference.

Amalia P M Bastos, Alex H Taylor

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Why birds are smart.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Kea, bird of versatility. Kea parrots (Journal of ornithology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Direct Inference and Probabilistic Accounts of Induction.Journal for general philosophy of science = Zeitschrift fur allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amalia P M BastosSchool of Psychology, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand. a.bastos@auckland.ac.nz.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3037-687X
Alex H TaylorSchool of Psychology, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3492-7667

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One key aspect of domain-general thought is the ability to integrate information across different cognitive domains. Here, we tested whether kea (Nestor notabilis) can use relative quantities when predicting sampling outcomes, and then integrate both physical information about the presence of a barrier, and social information about the biased sampling of an experimenter, into their predictions. Our results show that kea exhibit three signatures of statistical inference, and therefore can integrate knowledge across different cognitive domains to flexibly adjust their predictions of sampling events. This result provides evidence that true statistical inference is found outside of the great apes, and that aspects of domain-general thinking can convergently evolve in brains with a highly different structure from primates. This has important implications not only for our understanding of how intelligence evolves, but also for research focused on how to create artificial domain-general thought processes.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalAnimalsBrainLearningMaleParrotsReward

Identifiers

PMID32127523
PMCPMC7054307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.