ArticleSpinal cord series and cases2020
Attenuation of autonomic dysreflexia during functional electrical stimulation cycling by neuromuscular electrical stimulation training: case reports.
Article in Spinal cord series and cases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional electrical stimulation cycling exercise after spinal cord injury: a systematic review of health and fitness-related outcomes.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2021Pooled it
- Cross-lagged assessment between indices of leisure time physical activity and domains of quality of life after electrical stimulation training in persons with spinal cord injury: An exploratory trial.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2026Trial
- Vitamin D Supplementation Adjunct to Home-Based Electrical Stimulation Exercise Program Versus Passive Movement Training in Chronic SCI: Individual Results From Trial Under Accrual.Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2025Trial
- Attenuation of autonomic dysreflexia during functional electrical stimulation cycling by neuromuscular electrical stimulation training: case reports.Spinal cord series and cases · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSpinal cord injury (SCI) may cause impairments of the motor, sensory, and autonomic nervous systems, which result in adverse changes in body composition and cardiovascular health. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling may provide an effective alternative approach to perform exercise and improve cardiovascular health after SCI. Persons with an injury at or above T6 level are at high risk of developing a life-threatening complication of autonomic dysreflexia (AD). CASE PRESENTATION: Two participants with motor-complete C6 SCI completed either 12 weeks of passive range of motion or surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) resistance training, followed by 12 weeks of functional electrical stimulation (FES) lower extremity cycling for both participants. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) were measured to determine the effects of NMES-resistance training and FES-lower extremity cycling during rest and exercise. DISCUSSION: The difference between mean value of BP during FES-lower extremity cycling exercise and resting BP averaged for 24 sessions was smaller for participant A (31.25 mmHg for systolic BP and 10.44 mmHg for diastolic BP), who received NMES-resistance training, as compared with participant B (58.62 mmHg for systolic BP and 35.07 mmHg for diastolic BP). The results of these case reports suggest that 12 weeks of NMES-resistance training preceding FES-lower extremity cycling may attenuate the development of AD after SCI. Risk of AD, triggered by noxious stimuli, may be dampened with FES-lower extremity cycling training in persons with SCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.