Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32127174›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of surgery2020

Opportunities for machine learning to improve surgical ward safety.

Tyler J Loftus, Patrick J Tighe, Amanda C Filiberto, Jeremy Balch, Gilbert R Upchurch, Parisa Rashidi, Azra Bihorac

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tyler J LoftusDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Patrick J TigheDepartments of Anesthesiology, Orthopedics, and Information Systems/Operations Management, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Amanda C FilibertoDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Jeremy BalchDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Gilbert R UpchurchDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Parisa RashidiDepartments of Biomedical Engineering, Computer and Information Science and Engineering, and Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Precision and Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Azra BihoracPrecision and Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL, USA. Electronic address: abihorac@ufl.edu.

Funding

PICS: A New Horizon for Surgical Critical CareP50GM111152 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MOORE, FREDERICK A · 2014 to 2018
$10.7M
Integrating data, algorithms and clinical reasoning for surgical risk assessmentR01GM110240 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIHORAC, AZRA, RASHIDI, PARISA · 2016 to 2025
$5.1M
Molecular Biology in Burns and TraumaT32GM008721 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Philip A Efron · 1999 to 2026
$5.0M
Finding Good TEMporal PostOperative pain Signatures (TEMPOS)R01GM114290 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI TIGHE, PATRICK J · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM111152NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM110240NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114290NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008721
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelayed recognition of decompensation and failure-to-rescue on surgical wards are major sources of preventable harm. This review assimilates and critically evaluates available evidence and identifies opportunities to improve surgical ward safety. DATA SOURCES: Fifty-eight articles from Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed databases were included.

conclusionsOnly 15-20% of patients suffering ward arrest survive. In most cases, subtle signs of instability often occur prior to critical illness and arrest, and underlying pathology is reversible. Coarse risk assessments lead to under-triage of high-risk patients to wards, where surveillance for complications depends on time-consuming manual review of health records, infrequent patient assessments, prediction models that lack accuracy and autonomy, and biased, error-prone decision-making. Streaming electronic heath record data, wearable continuous monitors, and recent advances in deep learning and reinforcement learning can promote efficient and accurate risk assessments, earlier recognition of instability, and better decisions regarding diagnosis and treatment of reversible underlying pathology.

Indexed as

Machine LearningHumansPatient SafetyQuality ImprovementSurgery Department, HospitalSurgical Procedures, OperativeCardiac arrestDecompensationDeteriorationMachine learningSurgeryWard

Identifiers

PMID32127174
PMCPMC7673643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.