Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32127010›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2020

ITV versus mid-ventilation for treatment planning in lung SBRT: a comparison of target coverage and PTV adequacy by using in-treatment 4D cone beam CT.

J Bellec, F Arab-Ceschia, J Castelli, C Lafond, E Chajon

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Adoption of respiratory motion management in radiation therapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J BellecMedical Physics Department, Centre Eugène Marquis, avenue de La Bataille Flandres Dunkerque - CS 44229, F-35042, Rennes, France. j.bellec@rennes.unicancer.fr.
F Arab-CeschiaMedical Physics Department, Centre Eugène Marquis, avenue de La Bataille Flandres Dunkerque - CS 44229, F-35042, Rennes, France.
J CastelliRadiotherapy Department, Centre Eugène Marquis, avenue de La Bataille Flandres Dunkerque - CS 44229, F-35042, Rennes, France.
C LafondMedical Physics Department, Centre Eugène Marquis, avenue de La Bataille Flandres Dunkerque - CS 44229, F-35042, Rennes, France.
E ChajonRadiotherapy Department, Centre Eugène Marquis, avenue de La Bataille Flandres Dunkerque - CS 44229, F-35042, Rennes, France.
Centre Eugène Marquis · FRUniversité Rennes 2 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe internal target volume (ITV) approach and the mid-ventilation (MidV) concept are the two main respiratory motion-management strategies under free breathing. The purpose of this work was to compare the actual in-treatment target coverage during volumetric modulated arctherapy (VMAT) delivered through both ITV-based and MidV-based planning target volume (PTV) and to provide knowledge in choosing the optimal PTV for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung lesions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-two lung cancer patients treated by a VMAT technique were included in the study. For each fraction, the mean time-weighted position of the target was localized by using a 4-dimensional cone-beam CT (4D-CBCT)-based image guidance procedure. The respiratory-correlated location of the gross tumor volume (GTV) during treatment delivery was determined for each fraction by using in-treatment 4D-CBCT images acquired concurrently with VMAT delivery (4D-CBCT

resultsOverall, 100 4D-CBCT

conclusionWhen implementing VMAT with 4D-CBCT-based image guidance, an ITV-based approach with a tighter margin than the commonly used 5 mm margin remains an alternative to the MidV-based approach for reducing healthy tissue exposure in lung SBRT. Compared to PTV

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyFour-Dimensional Computed TomographyHumansLung NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted4D-CBCTGeometric uncertaintiesITVLung cancerMid-ventilationPlanning strategyRespiratory motionsStereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)

Identifiers

PMID32127010
PMCPMC7055092
OpenAlexW3010612975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.