Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32126982›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2020

Silica and asbestos exposure at work and the risk of bladder cancer in Canadian men: a population-based case-control study.

Lidija Latifovic, Paul J Villeneuve, Marie-Élise Parent, Linda Kachuri, Canadian Cancer Registries Epidemiology Group, Shelley A Harris

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Scoping Review of 5 Common Occupational Cancers and Their Related Exposures.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2022
    Article
  5. Occupational characterization of workers exposed to asbestos: an integrative review.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lidija LatifovicOccupational Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Care Ontario, Ontario Health, 525 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Paul J VilleneuveSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Marie-Élise ParentCentre Armand-Frappier Santé Biotechnologie, Institut national de la recherche scientifique, 531 boul des Prairies, Laval, QC, Canada.
Linda KachuriOccupational Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Care Ontario, Ontario Health, 525 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Canadian Cancer Registries Epidemiology Group
Shelley A HarrisOccupational Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Care Ontario, Ontario Health, 525 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada. Shelley.Harris@utoronto.ca.
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Toronto · CACancer Care Ontario · CAInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique · CA

Funding

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (Ontario) WSIB#10011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSilica and asbestos are recognized lung carcinogens. However, their role in carcinogenesis at other organs is less clear. Clearance of inhaled silica particles and asbestos fibers from the lungs may lead to translocation to sites such as the bladder where they may initiate carcinogenesis. We used data from a Canadian population-based case-control study to evaluate the associations between these workplace exposures and bladder cancer.

methodsData from a population-based case-control study were used to characterize associations between workplace exposure to silica and asbestos and bladder cancer among men. Bladder cancer cases (N = 658) and age-frequency matched controls (N = 1360) were recruited within the National Enhanced Cancer Surveillance System from eight Canadian provinces (1994-97). Exposure concentration, frequency and reliability for silica and asbestos were assigned to each job, based on lifetime occupational histories, using a combination of job-exposure profiles and expert review. Exposure was modeled as ever/never, highest attained concentration, duration (years), highest attained frequency (% worktime) and cumulative exposure. Odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using adjusted logistic regression.

resultsA modest (approximately 20%) increase in bladder cancer risk was found for ever having been exposed to silica, highest attained concentration and frequency of exposure but this increase was not statistically significant. Relative to unexposed, the odds of bladder cancer were 1.41 (95%CI: 1.01-1.98) times higher among men exposed to silica at work for ≥27 years. For asbestos, relative to unexposed, an increased risk of bladder cancer was observed for those first exposed ≥20 years ago (OR:2.04, 95%CI:1.25-3.34), those with a frequency of exposure of 5-30% of worktime (OR:1.45, 95%CI:1.06-1.98), and for those with < 10 years of exposure at low concentrations (OR:1.75, 95%CI:1.10-2.77) and the lower tertile of cumulative exposure (OR:1.69, 95%CI:1.07-2.65). However, no clear exposure-response relationships emerged.

conclusionsOur results indicate a slight increase in risk of bladder cancer with exposure to silica and asbestos, suggesting that the effects of these agents are broader than currently recognized. The findings from this study inform evidence-based action to enhance cancer prevention efforts, particularly for workers in industries with regular exposure.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAsbestosCanadaCase-Control StudiesEvidence-Based MedicineHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureSilicon DioxideUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAsbestosSilicon DioxideAsbestosBladder cancerCase-control studyExpert assessmentOccupational cancer risk factorsSilica

Identifiers

PMID32126982
PMCPMC7055116
OpenAlexW3010713264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.