Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32126974›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2020

Bone complications in patients with multiple myeloma in five European countries: a retrospective patient chart review.

María-Victoria Mateos, Leah Fink, Niranchana Koneswaran, Michele Intorcia, Christina Giannopoulou, Daniela Niepel, Michele Cavo

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Approaches To Managing Relapsed Myeloma: Switching Drug Class or Retreatment With Same Drug Class?Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Use of bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma patients in Denmark, 2005-2015.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

María-Victoria MateosHaematology Service, University Hospital Salamanca/IBSAL, Paseo San Vicente 58-182, 37007, Salamanca, Spain. mvmateos@usal.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2390-1218
Leah FinkKantar Health, Paris, France.
Niranchana KoneswaranKantar Health, Paris, France.
Michele IntorciaAmgen (Europe) GmbH, Rotkreuz, Switzerland.
Christina GiannopoulouAmgen (Europe) GmbH, Rotkreuz, Switzerland.
Daniela NiepelAmgen (Global Medical Affairs) GmbH, Rotkreuz, Switzerland.
Michele CavoSeragnoli Institute of Haematology and Medical Oncology, Bologna University School of Medicine, Bologna, Italy.
Amgen (Switzerland) · CHUniversidad de Salamanca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBone complications (pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, surgery to bone and radiation to bone) are a common problem in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). We set out to provide insights into the real-world burden of bone complications in patients with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM).

methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of medical charts of patients with NDMM whose disease had progressed following first-line treatment in the 3 months before data collection in 2016 in five European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom).

resultsThe aggregated study population included 813 patients. Bone pain commonly led to MM diagnosis (63%) and 74% of all patients had two or more bone lesions at initiation of first-line treatment. Furthermore, 26% of patients experienced a new bone complication between MM diagnosis and disease progression following first-line treatment, despite 75% of individuals receiving bisphosphonates. Most bone complications (52%) occurred in the period before initiation of first-line treatment (mean duration: 2.3 months) and more than half of patients (56%) who experienced a new bone complication were hospitalised. Analgesics were used more frequently in patients with bone complications than in those without them (76% vs 50%, respectively). Furthermore, 51% of patients had renal impairment by the time first-line treatment was started. Overall, 25% of patients did not receive bisphosphonates for prevention of bone complications and one in four of those with renal impairment at initiation of first-line treatment did not receive bisphosphonates.

conclusionsBone complications are common in patients with NDMM. They are frequently associated with hospitalization and analgesic use. Data from this study, conducted in the era of novel anti-myeloma therapies and before the approval of denosumab for use in patients with MM, suggest that although most patients (75%) received bisphosphonates, use of anti-resorptive therapy for prevention of bone complications may be suboptimal in patients with NDMM, irrespective of renal function.

Indexed as

AgedBone Density Conservation AgentsBone DiseasesDiphosphonatesFemaleFranceHospitalizationHumansItalyKidney Function TestsMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaRetrospective StudiesUnited KingdomBone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonatesBisphosphonatesBone complicationsChart reviewDenosumabEU5EuropeMultiple myelomaRenal impairmentSkeletal-related eventsZoledronic acid

Identifiers

PMID32126974
PMCPMC7055060
OpenAlexW3011999508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.