ArticleBMC microbiology2020
The influence of blood on the human gut microbiome.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiomic Analysis of the Gut Microbiome and Serum Metabolome in Response to a Low-Carbohydrate, High-Protein Diet in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury.Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2025Trial
- Microbiome signatures for detection of colorectal lesions in population-based FIT screening.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Article
- The effect of short-term consumption ofExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Medium-chain triglycerides and ketogenic diet prevent alterations of the gut microbiome in transgenic Alzheimer's disease mice.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Effects of Italian Mediterranean Organic Diet on the Gut Microbiota: A Pilot Comparative Study with Conventional Products and Free Diet.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Gut microbiota, immune cell, colorectal cancer association mediators: a Mendelian randomization study.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Fecal occult blood affects intestinal microbial community structure in colorectal cancer.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Influence of CTG repeats from the human DM1 locus on murine gut microbiota.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Influence of gut microbiota and immune markers in different stages of colorectal adenomas.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Linking the gut microbiome to host DNA methylation by a discovery and replication epigenome-wide association study.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Disturbance of the human gut microbiota in patients with Myotonic Dystrophy type 1.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Sex-Induced Changes in Microbial Eukaryotes and Prokaryotes in Gastrointestinal Tract of Simmental Cattle.Biology · 2024Article
- Species-level verification ofmSystems · 2024Article
- Dysbiosis Signature of Fecal Microbiota in Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma and Pancreatic Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Endogenous Coriobacteriaceae enriched by a high-fat diet promotes colorectal tumorigenesis through the CPT1A-ERK axis.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2024Article
- Predictive modeling of colorectal cancer using exhaustive analysis of microbiome information layers available from public metagenomic data.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Lectin-Seq: A method to profile lectin-microbe interactions in native communities.Science advances · 2023Article
- Microbiome diversity in African American, European American, and Egyptian colorectal cancer patients.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Steamed broccoli sprouts alleviate DSS-induced inflammation and retain gut microbial biogeography in mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the prevailing causes of cancer mortality in the world. A common screening test for CRC is based on the human hemoglobin immunochemical based fecal occult blood test (iFOBT), which consists in the detection of blood in the patient's stool. In addition to iFOBT, recent studies support the use of the gut microbiome as a biomarker for CRC prediction. However, these studies did not take into account the effect of blood itself on the microbiome composition, independently of CRC. Therefore, we investigated the microbiome of patients undergoing the iFOBT screening in order to determine the effect of blood alone. Our cohort consisted of patients who had no blood in their stools (n = 265) or did have blood but no underlying precancerous or cancerous lesions (n = 235). We also identified bacterial taxa specifically associated with the presence of blood in stools.
resultsWe observed significant differences in the intestinal bacterial composition that could be solely caused by the presence of blood in stools. More precisely, we identified 12 bacterial species showing significant differences in abundance between both our study groups. These species, Bacteroides uniformis, Collinsella aerofaciens, Eggerthella lenta and Clostridium symbiosum demonstrated increased abundance in the presence of blood. In contrast, the species Prevotella copri, Coprococcus eutactus and catus, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Roseburia faecis, Blautia obeum, Gemmiger formicilis and Clostridium celatum showed decreased abundance in patients with blood in their stools. Notably, we found multiple taxa that were reported in previous studies linking microbiome composition and diseases.
conclusionsWe show that, in the absence of disease, blood in the stools has a major influence on the composition of the microbiome. Our data suggest that blood itself should be taken into consideration when investigating the microbiome signatures of intestinal diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.