Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32126949›Full record

ArticlePerfusion2020

Myocardial perfusion and cardiac dimensions during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-supported circulation in a porcine model of critical post-cardiotomy failure.

Atle Solholm, Pirjo-Riitta Salminen, Lodve Stangeland, Christian Arvei Moen, Arve Mongstad, Bård Svenheim, Rune Haaverstad, Ketil Grong

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perfusion, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cardioprotection in cardiovascular surgery.Basic research in cardiology · 2024
    Review
  3. Left ventricular hemodynamics with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Atle SolholmSection of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7756-8433
Pirjo-Riitta SalminenSection of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Lodve StangelandDepartment of Clinical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Christian Arvei MoenSection of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Arve MongstadSection of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Bård SvenheimSection of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Rune HaaverstadSection of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Ketil GrongDepartment of Clinical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Haukeland University Hospital · NOUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVenoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is widely used as mechanical circulatory support for severe heart failure. A major concern with this treatment modality is left ventricular distension due to inability to overcome the afterload created by the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit. The present porcine study evaluates coronary circulation, myocardial perfusion and ventricular distension during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

methodsTen anesthetized open-chest pigs were cannulated and put on cardiopulmonary bypass. Heart failure was achieved by 90 minutes of aortic cross-clamping with insufficient cardioplegic protection. After declamping, the animals were supported by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for 3 hours. Continuous haemodynamic measurements were performed at baseline, during cardiopulmonary bypass/aortic cross-clamping and during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Fluorescent microsphere injections at baseline and after 1, 2 and 3 hours on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation evaluated myocardial perfusion. Left ventricular function and distension were assessed by epicardial echocardiography.

resultsThe myocardial injury caused by 90 minutes of ischaemia resulted in a poorly contracting myocardium, necessitating venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in all animals. The circulatory support maintained the mean arterial blood pressure within a satisfactory range. A hyperaemic left anterior descending coronary artery flow while on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was observed compared to baseline. Myocardial tissue perfusion measured by microspheres was low, especially in the subendocardium. Echocardiography revealed myocardial tissue oedema, a virtually empty left ventricle, and a left ventricular output that remained negligible throughout the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation run.

conclusionCoronary artery blood flow is maintained during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest despite severely affected performance of the left ventricle. Myocardial perfusion decreases, however, presumably due to rapid development of myocardial tissue oedema.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHemodynamicsHumansMaleSwinehaemodynamicsleft ventricle dimensionmyocardial perfusionpost-cardiotomy failurevenoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Identifiers

PMID32126949
PMCPMC7686924
OpenAlexW3009337264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.