Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32126404›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2020

Mixed organic and inorganic tapwater exposures and potential effects in greater Chicago area, USA.

Paul M Bradley, Maria Argos, Dana W Kolpin, Shannon M Meppelink, Kristin M Romanok, Kelly L Smalling, Michael J Focazio, Joshua M Allen, Julie E Dietze, Michael J Devito and 21 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Paul M BradleyU.S. Geological Survey, Columbia, SC, USA. Electronic address: pbradley@usgs.gov.
Maria ArgosUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Dana W KolpinU.S. Geological Survey, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Shannon M MeppelinkU.S. Geological Survey, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Kristin M RomanokU.S. Geological Survey, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA.
Kelly L SmallingU.S. Geological Survey, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA.
Michael J FocazioU.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, USA.
Joshua M AllenUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Julie E DietzeU.S. Geological Survey, Lawrence, KS, USA.
Michael J DevitoU.S. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences/NIH, Durham, NC, USA.
Ariel R DonovanU.S. Geological Survey, Lawrence, KS, USA.
Nicola EvansU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC, USA.
Carrie E GivensU.S. Geological Survey, Lancing, MI, USA.
James L GrayU.S. Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO, USA.
Christopher P HigginsColorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, USA.
Michelle L HladikU.S. Geological Survey, Sacramento, California, USA.
Luke R IwanowiczU.S. Geological Survey, Kearneysville, WV, USA.
Celeste A JourneyU.S. Geological Survey, Columbia, SC, USA.
Rachael F LaneU.S. Geological Survey, Lawrence, KS, USA.
Zachary R LaughreyU.S. Geological Survey, Lawrence, KS, USA.
Keith A LoftinU.S. Geological Survey, Lawrence, KS, USA.
R Blaine McCleskeyU.S. Geological Survey, Boulder, CO, USA.
Carrie A McDonoughColorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, USA.
Elizabeth Medlock-KakaleyU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC, USA.
Michael T MeyerU.S. Geological Survey, Lawrence, KS, USA.
Andrea R PutzCity of Chicago, Department of Water Management, Chicago, IL, USA.
Susan D RichardsonUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Alan E StarkCity of Chicago, Department of Water Management, Chicago, IL, USA.
Christopher P WeisU.S. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences/NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Vickie S WilsonU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC, USA.
Abderrahman ZehraouiCity of East Chicago, Utilities Department, East Chicago, IN, USA.
United States Geological Survey · USEnvironmental Protection Agency · USColorado School of Mines · USUniversity of South Carolina · USEastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma · USNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Safe drinking water at the point of use (tapwater, TW) is a public-health priority. TW exposures and potential human-health concerns of 540 organics and 35 inorganics were assessed in 45 Chicago-area United States (US) homes in 2017. No US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) enforceable Maximum Contaminant Level(s) (MCL) were exceeded in any residential or water treatment plant (WTP) pre-distribution TW sample. Ninety percent (90%) of organic analytes were not detected in treated TW, emphasizing the high quality of the Lake Michigan drinking-water source and the efficacy of the drinking-water treatment and monitoring. Sixteen (16) organics were detected in >25% of TW samples, with about 50 detected at least once. Low-level TW exposures to unregulated disinfection byproducts (DBP) of emerging concern, per/polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), and three pesticides were ubiquitous. Common exceedances of non-enforceable EPA MCL Goal(s) (MCLG) of zero for arsenic [As], lead [Pb], uranium [U], bromodichloromethane, and tribromomethane suggest potential human-health concerns and emphasize the continuing need for improved understanding of cumulative effects of low-concentration mixtures on vulnerable sub-populations. Because DBP dominated TW organics, residential-TW concentrations are potentially predictable with expanded pre-distribution DBP monitoring. However, several TW chemicals, notably Pb and several infrequently detected organic compounds, were not readily explained by pre-distribution samples, illustrating the need for continued broad inorganic/organic TW characterization to support consumer assessment of acceptable risk and point-of-use treatment options.

Indexed as

Water PurificationChicagoDrinking WaterMichiganPesticidesUnited StatesWater Pollutants, ChemicalDrinking WaterPesticidesWater Pollutants, ChemicalChicago USAContaminant mixturesDBPDisinfection byproductsExposureHuman healthInorganicsOrganicsPoint-of-use drinking waterTapwaterUrban

Identifiers

PMID32126404
PMCPMC9140060
OpenAlexW3005760069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.