Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32126266›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2020

Global Health Perspectives Among Radiation Oncology Residency Program Directors: A Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Survey.

Shekinah N C Elmore, Trevor J Royce, Oluwadamilola T Oladeru, Chris M Freese, Daniel V Wakefield, Neha Vapiwala, Anthony L Zietman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Global Health in Radiation Oncology: The Intention-Investment Gap.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Shekinah N C ElmoreHarvard Radiation Oncology Program, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: selmore@alumni.brown.edu.
Trevor J RoyceHarvard Radiation Oncology Program, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Oluwadamilola T OladeruHarvard Radiation Oncology Program, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Chris M FreeseDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Daniel V WakefieldUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Neha VapiwalaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Anthony L ZietmanHarvard Radiation Oncology Program, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of Cincinnati · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

UNC Oncology K12K12CA120780 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WILLIAM Y. KIM · 2007 to 2026
$9.6M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA120780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInterest in global health has risen among medical students applying to and residents training in radiation oncology, often outpacing available educational offerings. The Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology Global Health Subcommittee sought to determine the perceptions of program directors (PDs) in radiation oncology and their current or planned global health curricular opportunities. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A standardized, Knowledge-Attitudes-Practices survey composed of 32 binary items was sent to PDs for all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited radiation oncology programs.

resultsThe program response rate was 60% (55 of 91). Responding programs were distributed evenly geographically and included a range of training program sizes. Most PDs (77%) knew that most nations did not meet standard minimum benchmarks for radiation therapy access. Although 89% would support residents in pursuing global health rotations, only 22% would support departmental funding of such rotations. Furthermore, 94% believed that global health was a field worthy of an academic career, but only 39% believed that it had appropriate rigor. Only 8% of programs had dedicated global health rotations.

conclusionsRadiation oncology PDs largely expressed favorable views of global health as a pursuit and affirmed a high degree of resident and medical student interest. However, faculty commitment and program offerings currently lag behind the interest level. In particular, a substantial number of PDs do not perceive global health to be a rigorous academic endeavor. Future progress in academic global health in radiation oncology will require strategies to systematically support pathways for the development of experience and scholarship both within and beyond residency.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInternationalitySurveys and QuestionnairesInternship and ResidencyRadiation Oncology

Identifiers

PMID32126266
PMCPMC7650306
OpenAlexW3006844717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.