Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32126163›Full record

Observational studyPharmacology research & perspectives2020

Utility of accumulated opioid supply days and individual patient factors in predicting probability of transitioning to long-term opioid use: An observational study in the Veterans Health Administration.

Katherine Hadlandsmyth, Hilary J Mosher, Mark W Vander Weg, Amy M O'Shea, Kimberly D McCoy, Brian C Lund

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Effect of Multidisciplinary Transitional Pain Service on Health Care Use and Costs Following Orthopedic Surgery.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2023
    Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine HadlandsmythCenter for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0513-4609
Hilary J MosherCenter for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Mark W Vander WegCenter for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Amy M O'SheaCenter for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Kimberly D McCoyCenter for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Brian C LundCenter for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, IA, USA.
University of Iowa · USIowa City VA Health Care System · US

Funding

VA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Initial supply days dispensed to new users is strongly predictive of future long-term opioid use (LTO). The objective was to examine whether a model integrating additional clinical variables conferred meaningful improvement in predicting LTO, beyond a simple approach using only accumulated supply. Three cohorts were created using Veteran's Health Administration data based on accumulated supply days during the 90 days following opioid initiation: (a) <30 days, (b) ≥30 days, (c) ≥60 days. A base, unadjusted probability of subsequent LTO (days 91-365) was calculated for each cohort, along with an associated risk range based on midpoint values between cohorts. Within each cohort, log-binomial regression modeled the probability of subsequent LTO, using demographic, diagnostic, and medication characteristics. Each patient's LTO probability was determined using their individual characteristic values and model parameter estimates, where values falling outside the cohort's risk range were considered a clinically meaningful change in predictive value. Base probabilities for subsequent LTO and associated risk ranges by cohort were as follows: (a) 3.92% (0%-10.75%), (b) 17.59% (10.76%-28.05%), (c) 38.53% (28.06%-47.55%). The proportion of patients whose individual probability fell outside their cohort's risk range was as follows: 1.5%, 4.6%, and 9.2% for cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The strong relationship between accumulated supply days and future LTO offers an opportunity to leverage electronic healthcare records for decision support in preventing the initiation of inappropriate LTO through early intervention. More complex models are unlikely to meaningfully guide decision making beyond the single variable of accumulated supply days.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnalgesics, OpioidDrug PrescriptionsDrug UtilizationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOpioid-Related DisordersRiskTime FactorsUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsVeterans HealthAnalgesics, Opioidlong-termmedical record dataopioidVeteran

Identifiers

PMID32126163
PMCPMC7053662
OpenAlexW3010111246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.