Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32126112›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Evaluating kratom alkaloids using PHASE.

Christopher R Ellis, Rebecca Racz, Naomi L Kruhlak, Marlene T Kim, Alexey V Zakharov, Noel Southall, Edward G Hawkins, Keith Burkhart, David G Strauss, Lidiya Stavitskaya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Interactive Effects ofThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher R EllisDivision of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Rebecca RaczDivision of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Naomi L KruhlakDivision of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Marlene T KimDivision of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Alexey V ZakharovNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.
Noel SouthallNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.
Edward G HawkinsControlled Substances Staff, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Keith BurkhartDivision of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
David G StraussDivision of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Lidiya StavitskayaDivision of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6307-2314
United States Food and Drug Administration · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Inxight Informatics System - Repository of Therapeutic HypothesesZIATR000058 · NCATS · NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES · PI MATHE, EWY · 2015 to 2022
$17.9M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA TR000058NIDA NIH HHS HHSN271201800023C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kratom is a botanical substance that is marketed and promoted in the US for pharmaceutical opioid indications despite having no US Food and Drug Administration approved uses. Kratom contains over forty alkaloids including two partial agonists at the mu opioid receptor, mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine, that have been subjected to the FDA's scientific and medical evaluation. However, pharmacological and toxicological data for the remaining alkaloids are limited. Therefore, we applied the Public Health Assessment via Structural Evaluation (PHASE) protocol to generate in silico binding profiles for 25 kratom alkaloids to facilitate the risk evaluation of kratom. PHASE demonstrates that kratom alkaloids share structural features with controlled opioids, indicates that several alkaloids bind to the opioid, adrenergic, and serotonin receptors, and suggests that mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine are the strongest binders at the mu opioid receptor. Subsequently, the in silico binding profiles of a subset of the alkaloids were experimentally verified at the opioid, adrenergic, and serotonin receptors using radioligand binding assays. The verified binding profiles demonstrate the ability of PHASE to identify potential safety signals and provide a tool for prioritizing experimental evaluation of high-risk compounds.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesHEK293 CellsHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMitragynaMolecular Docking SimulationPlants, MedicinalRadioligand AssayReceptors, AdrenergicReceptors, OpioidReceptors, Opioid, muReceptors, SerotoninSecologanin Tryptamine AlkaloidsStructure-Activity RelationshipmitragynineReceptors, AdrenergicReceptors, OpioidReceptors, Opioid, muReceptors, SerotoninSecologanin Tryptamine Alkaloids

Identifiers

PMID32126112
PMCPMC7053747
OpenAlexW3010250210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.