ArticlePloS one2020
Evaluation of image filters for their integration with LSQR computerized tomography reconstruction method.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In CT (computerized tomography) imaging reconstruction, the acquired sinograms are usually noisy, so artifacts will appear on the resulting images. Thus, it is necessary to find the adequate filters to combine with reconstruction methods that eliminate the greater amount of noise possible without altering in excess the information that the image contains. The present work is focused on the evaluation of several filtering techniques applied in the elimination of artifacts present in CT sinograms. In particular, we analyze the elimination of Gaussian and Speckle noise. The chosen filtering techniques have been studied using four functions designed to measure the quality of the filtered image and compare it with a reference image. In this way, we determine the ideal parameters to carry out the filtering process on the sinograms, prior to the process of reconstruction of the images. Moreover, we study their application on reconstructed noisy images when using noisy sinograms and finally we select the best filter to combine with an iterative reconstruction method in order to test if it improves the quality of the images. With this, we can determine the feasibility of using the selected filtering method for our CT reconstructions with projections reduction, concluding that the bilateral filter is the filter that behaves best with our images. We will test it when combined with our iterative reconstruction method, which consists on the Least Squares QR method in combination with a regularization technique and an acceleration step, showing how integrating this filter with our reconstruction method improves the quality of the CT images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.