Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32126108›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Clinically significant changes in pain along the Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale in patients with chronic low back pain.

Hidenori Suzuki, Shuichi Aono, Shinsuke Inoue, Yasuaki Imajo, Norihiro Nishida, Masahiro Funaba, Hidenori Harada, Aki Mori, Mishiya Matsumoto, Fumihiro Higuchi and 7 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 97 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04542798 naunknown statusnot on this map

Central Sensitization and Aberrant Nerve Sprouting Possible Explanations for RFA Failure of MBDR in CLBP of FJ Origin: CRF Versus WCRF or PRF-DRG Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital General Universitario de ValenciaRan2020 to 2024Enrolled80ConditionsLow Back Pain, Recurrent, Neuropathic Pain, Facet Joint Pain, Central SensitisationArmsRadiofrequency COSMAN
NCT06777095 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Different Kinesio Taping Treatments Added to the Physical Therapy Program on Pain, Endurance, Lumbar Proprioception, Mobility and Disability in Patients Diagnosed With Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSevtap GünayRan2023 to 2024Enrolled90ConditionsLumbar Disc Herniation, Lumbar Disc Disease, Chronic PainArmsRoutine Treatment + I Taping, Routine Treatment + Star Taping, Routine Treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Paddle leads for the treatment of nonsurgical back pain-The DISTINCT study.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2025
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. The influence of brain metastases on the central nervous system effects of methylnaltrexone: a post hoc analysis of 3 randomized, double-blind studies.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Trial

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Hidenori SuzukiDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3156-0591
Shuichi AonoMultidisciplinary Pain Center, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.
Shinsuke InoueMultidisciplinary Pain Center, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7227-3695
Yasuaki ImajoDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Norihiro NishidaDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Masahiro FunabaDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Hidenori HaradaPain Management Research Institute, Yamaguchi University Hospital, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Aki MoriPain Management Research Institute, Yamaguchi University Hospital, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Mishiya MatsumotoPain Management Research Institute, Yamaguchi University Hospital, Yamaguchi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3774-0558
Fumihiro HiguchiPain Management Research Institute, Yamaguchi University Hospital, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Shin NakagawaPain Management Research Institute, Yamaguchi University Hospital, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Shu TaharaPain Management Research Institute, Yamaguchi University Hospital, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Satoshi IkedaPain Management Research Institute, Yamaguchi University Hospital, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Hironori IzumiPain Management Research Institute, Yamaguchi University Hospital, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Toshihiko TaguchiDepartment of Orthopedics Surgery, Yamaguchi Rosai Hospital, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Takahiro UshidaMultidisciplinary Pain Center, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.
Takashi SakaiDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) is the most common cause of chronic pain. Numerous clinical scales are available for evaluating pain, but their objective criteria in the management of LBP patients remain unclear. This study aimed to determine an objective cutoff value for a change in the Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (ΔPI-NRS) three months after LBP treatment. Its utility was compared with changes in six commonly used clinical scales in LBP patients: Pain Disability Assessment Scale (PDAS), Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEC), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS), EuroQoL 5 Dimension (EQ5D), and Locomo 25. We included 161 LBP patients treated in two representative pain management centers. Patients were partitioned into two groups based on patient's global impression of change (PGIC) three months after treatment: satisfied (PGIC = 1, 2) and unsatisfied (3-7). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to explore relevant scales in distinguishing the two groups. We found ΔPI-NRS to be most closely associated with PGIC status regardless of pre-treatment pain intensity, followed by ΔEQ5D, ΔPDAS, ΔPSEC, and ΔPCS. The ΔPI-NRS cutoff value for distinguishing the PGIC status was determined by ROC analysis to be 1.3-1.8 depending on pre-treatment PI-NRS, which was rounded up to ΔPI-NRS = 2 for general use. Spearman's correlation coefficient revealed close relationships between ΔPI-NRS and the six other clinical scales. Therefore, we determined cutoff values of these scales in distinguishing the status of ΔPI-NRS≥2 vs. ΔPI-NRS<2 to be as follows: ΔPDAS, 6.71; ΔPSEC, 6.48; ΔPCS, 6.48; ΔAIS, 1.91; ΔEQ5D, 0.08; and ΔLocomo 25, 9.31. These can be used as definitive indicator of therapeutic outcome in the management of chronic LBP patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnostic Self EvaluationDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32126108
PMCPMC7053735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.