Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32125737›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2020

CVSnet: A machine learning approach for automated central vein sign assessment in multiple sclerosis.

Pietro Maggi, Mário João Fartaria, João Jorge, Francesco La Rosa, Martina Absinta, Pascal Sati, Reto Meuli, Renaud Du Pasquier, Daniel S Reich, Meritxell Bach Cuadra and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Artificial Intelligence and Multiple Sclerosis.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Pietro MaggiDepartment of Neurology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1697-5585
Mário João FartariaAdvanced Clinical Imaging Technology, Siemens Healthcare AG, Lausanne, Switzerland.
João JorgeLaboratory for Functional and Metabolic Imaging, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Francesco La RosaSignal Processing Laboratory (LTS5), École Polytechnique Fédéral de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9224-4664
Martina AbsintaTranslational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-0276-383X
Pascal SatiTranslational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Reto MeuliDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Renaud Du PasquierDepartment of Neurology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2786-3434
Daniel S ReichTranslational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-2628-4334
Meritxell Bach CuadraSignal Processing Laboratory (LTS5), École Polytechnique Fédéral de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Cristina GranzieraNeurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Jonas RichiardiAdvanced Clinical Imaging Technology, Siemens Healthcare AG, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Tobias KoberAdvanced Clinical Imaging Technology, Siemens Healthcare AG, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7598-9456
National Institutes of Health · USSiemens Healthineers (Germany) · DEÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CHCentre d'Imagerie BioMedicale · CHCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

Multimodal MRI in Multiple SclerosisZIANS003119 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI REICH, DANIEL · 2010 to 2025
$53.4M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA NS003119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The central vein sign (CVS) is an efficient imaging biomarker for multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis, but its application in clinical routine is limited by inter-rater variability and the expenditure of time associated with manual assessment. We describe a deep learning-based prototype for automated assessment of the CVS in white matter MS lesions using data from three different imaging centers. We retrospectively analyzed data from 3 T magnetic resonance images acquired on four scanners from two different vendors, including adults with MS (n = 42), MS mimics (n = 33, encompassing 12 distinct neurological diseases mimicking MS) and uncertain diagnosis (n = 5). Brain white matter lesions were manually segmented on FLAIR* images. Perivenular assessment was performed according to consensus guidelines and used as ground truth, yielding 539 CVS-positive (CVS

Indexed as

Machine LearningSoftwareAutomationHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultiple SclerosisVeinsWhite MatterCentral vein signdeep learningMS mimicsmultiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID32125737
PMCPMC7754184
OpenAlexW3010028517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.