Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32125687›Full record

ArticleEating and weight disorders : EWD2021

The association between pre-conception intuitive eating and gestational weight gain.

Tracey Ledoux, Sajeevika Saumali Daundasekara, Anitra Beasley, Jessica Robinson, McClain Sampson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tracey LedouxDepartment of Health and Human Performance, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204, USA. taledoux@uh.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4935-4822
Sajeevika Saumali DaundasekaraDepartment of Health and Human Performance, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204, USA.
Anitra BeasleyBaylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Pavilion for Women, 6651 Main Street, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Jessica RobinsonDepartment of Health and Human Performance, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204, USA.
McClain SampsonGraduate College of Social Work, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204, USA.
University of Houston · USBaylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

University of Houston College of Liberal Arts and Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine if pre-conception intuitive eating, an adaptive eating behavior, was related to gestational weight gain (GWG) and the likelihood of exceeding GWG recommendations.

methodsThis prospective survey study took place in an outpatient obstetric clinic. Participants completed the pre-conception Intuitive Eating Scale for Pregnancy during a prenatal check-up appointment and total GWG was collected from the medical record. The pre-conception Intuitive Eating Scale for Pregnancy assesses unconditional permission to eat, eating for physical rather than emotional reasons, and reliance on hunger and satiety to inform what, when, and how much to eat. Hierarchical linear multiple regression and logistic multiple regression analyses determined associations between pre-conception intuitive eating and GWG on the total sample and stratified by weight status (normal/underweight, overweight, and obese).

resultsThe majority of the sample (n = 253) was white, married, employed, had annual household income > $50,000, and had a college degree. No aspects of pre-conception intuitive eating predicted the likelihood of excess GWG. However, in the total sample, unconditional permission to eat (subscale) was inversely related to total GWG (B = -0.16, p < 0.05). Among women with obesity (n = 36), eating for physical rather than emotional reasons (subscale) was inversely related to total GWG (B = -0.47, p < 0.05). DISCUSSION: Some aspects of intuitive eating during the pre-conception period were related to total GWG, particularly for women with obesity. However, intuitive eating scores did not increase or decrease the likelihood of excess GWG. More research is needed to understand the mechanisms for this association before clinical recommendations can be made. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III (Evidence obtained from well-designed cohort or case-control analytic studies).

Indexed as

Gestational Weight GainBody Mass IndexFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansOverweightPregnancyProspective StudiesGestational weight gainIntuitive eatingObesityPre-conception

Identifiers

PMID32125687
OpenAlexW3010013856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.