Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32125670›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2020

Current Evidence of Measurement Properties of Physical Activity Questionnaires for Older Adults: An Updated Systematic Review.

Matteo C Sattler, Johannes Jaunig, Christoph Tösch, Estelle D Watson, Lidwine B Mokkink, Pavel Dietz, Mireille N M van Poppel

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 59 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06429124 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Time-Restricted Eating in Alzheimer's Disease : The T.R.E.A.D Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, PhoenixRan2023 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsMild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)ArmsDietary Intervention
NCT06734286 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

CogMed Intervention Targeting Working Memory in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, PhoenixRan2024 to 2025Enrolled10ConditionsMild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)ArmsCogMed
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Physical activity and two-year change in adolescent well-being in nine countries.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Validity and reliability of self-reported methods for assessment of 24-h movement behaviours: a systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2024
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Leisure-time physical activity and metabolomic trajectories over the transition from late midlife to old age.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  15. Exercise Habits in Older Adults: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Matteo C SattlerInstitute of Sport Science, University of Graz, Graz, Austria. matteo.sattler@uni-graz.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0689-1938
Johannes JaunigInstitute of Sport Science, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Christoph TöschInstitute of Sport Science, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Estelle D WatsonSchool of Therapeutic Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Lidwine B MokkinkDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pavel DietzInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Medical Centre, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Mireille N M van PoppelInstitute of Sport Science, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
University of Graz · ATAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuestionnaires provide valuable information about physical activity (PA) behaviors in older adults. Until now, no firm recommendations for the most qualified questionnaires for older adults have been provided.

objectivesThis review is an update of a previous systematic review, published in 2010, and aims to summarize, appraise and compare the measurement properties of all available self-administered questionnaires assessing PA in older adults.

methodsWe included the articles evaluated in the previous review and conducted a new search in PubMed, Embase, and SPORTDiscus from September 2008 to December 2019, using the following inclusion criteria (1) the purpose of the study was to evaluate at least one measurement property (reliability, measurement error, hypothesis testing for construct validity, responsiveness) of a self-administered questionnaire; (2) the questionnaire intended to measure PA; (3) the questionnaire covered at least one domain of PA; (4) the study was performed in the general, healthy population of older adults; (5) the mean age of the study population was > 55 years; and (6) the article was published in English. Based on the Quality Assessment of Physical Activity Questionnaires (QAPAQ) checklist, we evaluated the quality and results of the studies. The content validity of all included questionnaires was also evaluated using the reviewers' rating. The quality of the body of evidence was evaluated for the overall construct of each questionnaire (e.g., total PA), moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and walking using a modified Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

resultsIn total, 56 articles on 40 different questionnaires (14 from the previous review and 26 from the update) were included. Reliability was assessed for 22, measurement error for four and hypotheses testing for construct validity for 38 different questionnaires. Evidence for responsiveness was available for one questionnaire. For many questionnaires, only one measurement property was assessed in only a single study. Sufficient content validity was considered for 22 questionnaires. All questionnaires displayed large measurement errors. Only versions of two questionnaires showed both sufficient reliability and hypotheses testing for construct validity, namely the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE; English version, Turkish version) for the assessment of total PA, and the Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire (PASB-Q; English version) for the assessment of MVPA. The quality of evidence for these results ranged from very low to high.

conclusionsUntil more high-quality evidence is available, we recommend the PASE for measuring total PA and the PASB-Q for measuring MVPA in older adults. However, they are not equally qualified among different languages. Future studies on the most promising questionnaires should cover all relevant measurement properties. We recommend using and improving existing PA questionnaires-instead of developing new ones-and considering the strengths and weaknesses of each PA measurement instrument for a particular purpose.

Indexed as

Geriatric AssessmentAgedExerciseHumansMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID32125670
PMCPMC7305082
OpenAlexW3009374791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.