Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32125516›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2020

Iodine overlays to improve differentiation between peritoneal carcinomatosis and benign peritoneal lesions.

Simon Lennartz, David Zopfs, Nuran Abdullayev, Grischa Bratke, Markus Le Blanc, Karin Slebocki, Anton Wagner, Christian Wybranski, Roger Wahba, David Maintz and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Spectral CT imaging for assessment of metastases in melanoma patients: multi-reader evaluation.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Imaging in malignant peritoneal neoplasms.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Advances in the management of peritoneal malignancies.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Simon LennartzDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114-2696, USA. slennartz@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3254-4809
David ZopfsInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Nuran AbdullayevInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Grischa BratkeInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Markus Le BlancInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Karin SlebockiInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Anton WagnerInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Christian WybranskiInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Roger WahbaDepartment of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
David MaintzInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Nils Große HokampInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Thorsten PersigehlInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung Grant 2018_EKMS34Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung (DE) 2016-Kolleg-19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPeritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is a prognostically relevant metastatic disease which may be difficult to depict in postoperative patients, particularly in early stages. This study aimed to determine whether PC could be diagnosed more accurately when using a combination of spectral detector CT (SDCT)-derived conventional images (CI) and iodine overlay images (IO) compared with CI only.

methodsThirty patients with PC and 30 patients with benign peritoneal alterations (BPA) who underwent portal-venous abdominal SDCT were included. Four radiologists determined the presence/absence of PC for each patient and assessed lesion conspicuity, diagnostic certainty, and image quality using 5-point Likert scales. Subjective assessment was conducted in two sessions comprising solely CI and CI/IO between which a latency of 6 weeks was set. Iodine uptake and HU attenuation were determined ROI-based to analyze quantitative differentiation of PC/BPA.

resultsSpecificity for PC was significantly higher when using CI/IO compared with using CI only (0.86 vs. 0.78, p ≤ 0.05), while sensitivity was comparable (0.79 vs. 0.81, p = 1). In postoperative patients, the increase in specificity was the highest (0.93 vs. 0.80, p ≤ 0.05). Lesion conspicuity was rated higher in CI/IO (4 (3-5)) compared with that in CI only (3 (3-4); p ≤ 0.05). Diagnostic certainty was comparable (both 4 (3-5); p = 0.5). CI/IO received the highest rating for overall image quality and assessability (CI/IO 5 (4-5) vs. CI 4 (4-4) vs. IO 4 (3-4); p ≤ 0.05). Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) for quantitative differentiation between PC and BPA was higher for iodine (AUC

conclusionsCompared with CI, combination of CI/IO improves specificity in the assessment of peritoneal carcinomatosis at comparable sensitivity, particularly in postoperative patients. KEY POINTS: • Combination of iodine overlays and conventional images improves specificity when assessing patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis at comparable sensitivity. • Particularly in postsurgical patients, iodine overlays could help to avoid false-positive diagnosis of peritoneal disease. • Iodine overlays alone provided inferior image quality and assessability than conventional images, while the combination of both received the highest ratings. Iodine overlays should therefore be used in addition to and not as a substitute for conventional images.

Indexed as

AgedDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansIodineMaleMiddle AgedPeritoneal NeoplasmsPeritoneumPortal VeinROC CurveTomography, X-Ray ComputedIodineAbdominal cavityImage processing, computer-assistedIodinePeritoneal neoplasmsTomography, X-ray computed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.