Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32125491›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2020

Physiotherapy assessment for female urinary incontinence.

B Berghmans, M R Seleme, A T M Bernards

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

B BerghmansPelvic care Center Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 az, Maastricht, The Netherlands. bary.berghmans@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-6784-2523
M R Selemeabafi-HOLLAND, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
A T M BernardsDepartment of Physiotherapy, Centre for Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Faculdade Brasil · BRHAN University of Applied Sciences · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisAs noted in the 6th International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI) chapter "Initial Management of Urinary Incontinence in Women" recommendations call for including physiotherapy as a first-line therapy.

methodsBuilding on this, checking available scientific evidence and using the International Classification of Functioning, Disabilities and Health, the following represents a holistic physiotherapist approach for initial evaluation of the health problem of urinary incontinence.

resultsThis paper proposes a teaching module for every relevant health care professional dealing with the assessment of adult female urinary incontinence, focusing on optimal patient selection and appropriate treatment choice.

conclusionThe assessment stage involves the explicit decision as to whether "physiotherapy" is the treatment indicated for the patient, based on the findings of the physiotherapy assessment and supplemented by any medical information that accompanied the referral and evaluation.

Indexed as

Urinary IncontinenceAdultFemaleHumansPhysical Therapy ModalitiesReferral and ConsultationAssessmentDiagnosticFemaleInitial management(Pelvic) PhysiotherapyPsychometric measurementUrinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID32125491
PMCPMC7210229
OpenAlexW3009208737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.