ArticleNeurosurgery2020
Identification of Meningioma Patients at High Risk of Tumor Recurrence Using MicroRNA Profiling.
Article in Neurosurgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association Between miRNAs and the Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Recurrence of Patients with Meningioma: A Systematic Review.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2026Pooled it
- Epigenetic Alterations in Meningiomas-A Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Hemagglutinating virus of Japan envelope encapsulating microRNA-34a-5p robustly induces apoptosis of malignant meningioma cells by suppressing survivin.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- In Silico Identification of circPIM1/miR-16-5p/miR-195-5p/PIM1 Feed-Forward Loop in Recurrent Grade 2 Meningioma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- MicroRNAs in meningiomas: Potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets.Non-coding RNA research · 2024Review
- Neurosurgical treatment and outcome patterns in patients with meningioma in South Moravian region-a population-based study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024Article
- Noncoding RNA landscape and their emerging roles as biomarkers and therapeutic targets in meningioma.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2024Review
- Domestic Animal Models of Central Nervous System Tumors: Focus on Meningiomas.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Review
- Case Report: Recurrent meningioma with multiple metastases.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- MicroRNAs miR-16 and miR-519 control meningioma cell proliferationFrontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Utilization of Cerebrospinal Fluid Proteome Analysis in the Diagnosis of Meningioma: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMeningioma growth rates are highly variable, even within benign subgroups, with some remaining stable, whereas others grow rapidly.
objectiveTo identify molecular-genetic markers for more accurate prediction of meningioma recurrence and better-targeted therapy.
methodsMicroarrays identified microRNA (miRNA) expression in primary and recurrent meningiomas of all World Health Organization (WHO) grades. Those found to be deregulated were further validated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction in a cohort of 172 patients. Statistical analysis of the resulting dataset revealed predictors of meningioma recurrence.
resultsAdjusted and nonadjusted models of time to relapse identified the most significant prognosticators to be miR-15a-5p, miR-146a-5p, and miR-331-3p. The final validation phase proved the crucial significance of miR-146a-5p and miR-331-3p, and clinical factors such as type of resection (total or partial) and WHO grade in some selected models. Following stepwise selection in a multivariate model on an expanded cohort, the most predictive model was identified to be that which included lower miR-331-3p expression (hazard ratio [HR] 1.44; P < .001) and partial tumor resection (HR 3.90; P < .001). Moreover, in the subgroup of total resections, both miRNAs remained prognosticators in univariate models adjusted to the clinical factors.
conclusionThe proposed models might enable more accurate prediction of time to meningioma recurrence and thus determine optimal postoperative management. Moreover, combining this model with current knowledge of molecular processes underpinning recurrence could permit the identification of distinct meningioma subtypes and enable better-targeted therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.