ArticleJAMA network open2020
Analysis of Patient-Physician Concordance in the Understanding of Chemotherapy Treatment Plans Among Patients With Cancer.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determinants of self-management among gastrointestinal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a structural equation modeling analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Impact of Oncology Patients' Knowledge and Awareness on Emergency Visits and Hospital Admissions: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cancer management and research · 2026Article
- Patient and Family Caregiver Perspectives on Therapy De-Escalation in Cancer: A Scoping Review.Psycho-oncology · 2025Article
- Patient-physician agreement on function and pain is associated with long-term outcomes in sarcoma: findings from a longitudinal study.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Article
- Developing questions to assess and measure patients' perceived survival benefit from adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer: a mixed methods pilot study.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2024Article
- First impressions: A prospective evaluation of patient-physician concordance and satisfaction following the initial medical oncology consultation.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Chinese Parents' Perspective on Myopia: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Article
- Using Telemedicine to Facilitate Patient Communication and Treatment Decision-Making Following Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Review for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2023Article
- When can cancer patient treatment nonadherence be considered intentional or unintentional? A scoping review.PloS one · 2023Article
- Serious Illness Conversation Training for Inpatient Medical Oncology Advanced Practice Providers: A Quality Improvement Project.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The treatment plans of patients with cancer involve multiple modalities that oncologists need to explain to patients. One such modality is chemotherapy, in which information about the goals, duration, and expected complications of therapy are considered fundamental to achieving optimal patient understanding. Therefore, effective communication between patients and their treating physicians is important to ensure patient adherence to treatment and achieve better outcomes. Objective: To investigate the concordance in the understanding of chemotherapy treatment plans between patients and their treating oncologists and to identify the potential factors associated with concordance. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional study was conducted among adult patients (aged >18 years) with cancer who consented to receive chemotherapy between October 4, 2017, and November 8, 2018. The study also included the treating oncologists of patients receiving chemotherapy. An interview-based structured questionnaire was administered in both inpatient and outpatient settings at the Princess Noorah Oncology Center in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The demographic data of patients and physicians were obtained from the ARIA Oncology Information System, a chemotherapy-prescribing software database used at the center. Patients who had a personal history of cancer or were unwilling to be involved in the decision-making process were excluded. Data were analyzed from November 15 to December 20, 2018. Exposures: Patients' comprehension and concordance with their treating physicians regarding the aspects of the intended treatment plan. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes measured were the patient-physician concordance level in the understanding of treatment plans and the identification of patient-related and physician-related factors associated with the level of concordance. Results: A total of 151 adult patients (77 men [51.0%] and 74 women [49.0%]) were interviewed. Of those, 144 patients (75.5%) were younger than 60 years, and 52 patients (34.4%) had a college or advanced degree. A total of 20 treating oncologists were interviewed, of whom 14 (70.0%) were men and 6 (30.0%) were women. Arabic was the primary language of 19 oncologists (95.0%), and 19 oncologists (95.0%) had medical practice experience outside of Saudi Arabia. Only 20 patients (13.7%) had full concordance with their physicians regarding the aspects of their treatment plans. The remaining 131 patients (86.2%) had discordance with 1 or more aspect of their treatment plans. The most common aspect of discordance was the planned duration of the chemotherapy regimen, with 104 patients (68.4%) having full discordance. Full patient-physician concordance was more likely among patients with college or advanced degrees (χ21 = 17.73; P < .001) and patients with a family history of cancer (χ21 = 15.88; P < .001). In addition, older physicians (>40 years) compared with younger physicians (aged 30-40 years) were more likely to achieve higher rates of full patient-physician concordance, whereas older patients (>60 years) were associated with only partial concordance compared with patients younger than 60 years (χ21 = 5.84; P = .008), with an AR of 2.7. Conclusions and Relevance: Most patients showed suboptimal understanding of aspects of their chemotherapy treatment plans. More effort and time should be dedicated to enhancing the understanding of chemotherapy plans among patients with lower educational levels. In addition, self-report surveys that evaluate patients' understanding of their chemotherapy treatment plans should be developed and added to the informed consent process to objectively assess how much a patient understands and to develop a stepwise patient education program that targets patients with the lowest levels of understanding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.