Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32125412›Full record

SynthesisTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene2020

Lassa fever in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nzelle D Kayem, Charlotte Benson, Christina Y L Aye, Sarah Barker, Mariana Tome, Stephen Kennedy, Proochista Ariana, Peter Horby

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical Outcomes of Severe Lassa Fever in West Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Ebola virus disease in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Decoding the human CD4Cell reports. Medicine · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Robust polyfunctional CD8The Journal of general virology · 2025
    Article
  17. Vaccination in pregnancy to protect the newborn.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nzelle D KayemNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LG, UK.
Charlotte BensonWomen's Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Christina Y L AyeWomen's Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Sarah BarkerWomen's Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Mariana TomeStoke Mandeville Hospital, Mandeville Road, Aylesbury, HP21 8AL, UK.
Stephen KennedyNuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Proochista ArianaNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LG, UK.
Peter HorbyNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LG, UK.
University of Oxford · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBStoke Mandeville Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lassa fever is a zoonotic infection endemic to West Africa and is known to have adverse effects in pregnancy. We sought to synthesize and critically appraise currently available evidence on the effects of Lassa fever in pregnancy. An exhaustive bibliographic search from dates of inception to 30 September 2019 yielded 13 studies, from which individual patient data were extracted. The absolute risk of maternal death associated with Lassa fever was estimated at 33.73% (95% CI 22.05 to 46.42%, I2=72.40%, p=0.0014). The relative risk of death in pregnant women compared with non-pregnant women was estimated at 2·86 (95% CI 1.77 to 4.63, I2=27.27%, p=0.239). The formal gap analysis shows imprecise data on the risk of Lassa-related maternal and perinatal mortality and insufficient data for other pregnancy outcomes. The currently available evidence for the use of ribavirin in pregnant patients is not conclusive. With a threefold increased risk of mortality, there is a need to prioritize pregnant women as a special subgroup of interest for Lassa research. Robust prospective studies estimating the true incidence of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes and randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy of therapeutics for maternal Lassa virus infection are urgently needed.

Indexed as

Lassa FeverAfrica, WesternAnimalsFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeProspective StudiesZoonosescase fatality rateLassa feverperinatal mortalitypregnancy outcomes

Identifiers

PMID32125412
PMCPMC7197258
OpenAlexW3010021151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.