ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2020
Improved compressed sensing and super-resolution of cardiac diffusion MRI with structure-guided total variation.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based diffusion tensor cardiac magnetic resonance reconstruction: a comparison study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Present and Future Innovations in AI and Cardiac MRI.Radiology · 2024Review
- In Vivo Super-Resolution Cardiac Diffusion Tensor MRI: A Feasibility Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
- A comprehensive review of deep learning-based single image super-resolution.PeerJ. Computer science · 2021Article
- Improved compressed sensing and super-resolution of cardiac diffusion MRI with structure-guided total variation.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeStructure-guided total variation is a recently introduced prior that allows reconstruction of images using knowledge of the location and orientation of edges in a reference image. In this work, we demonstrate the advantages of a variant of structure-guided total variation known as directional total variation (DTV), over traditional total variation (TV), in the context of compressed-sensing reconstruction and super-resolution.
methodsWe compared TV and DTV in retrospectively undersampled ex vivo diffusion tensor imaging and diffusion spectrum imaging data from healthy, sham, and hypertrophic rat hearts.
resultsIn compressed sensing at an undersampling factor of 8, the RMS error of mean diffusivity and fractional anisotropy relative to the fully sampled ground truth were 44% and 20% lower in DTV compared with TV. In super-resolution, these values were 29% and 14%, respectively. Similarly, we observed improvements in helix angle, transverse angle, sheetlet elevation, and sheetlet azimuth. The RMS error of the diffusion kurtosis in the undersampled data relative to the ground truth was uniformly lower (22% on average) with DTV compared to TV.
conclusionAcquiring one fully sampled non-diffusion-weighted image and 10 diffusion-weighted images at 8× undersampling would result in an 80% net reduction in data needed. We demonstrate efficacy of the DTV algorithm over TV in reducing data sampling requirements, which can be translated into higher apparent resolution and potentially shorter scan times. This method would be equally applicable in diffusion MRI applications outside the heart.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.