Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32124930›Full record

ArticleBioscience reports2020

The effect of different concentrations of gold nanoparticles on growth performance, toxicopathological and immunological parameters of broiler chickens.

Eman I Hassanen, Eman A Morsy, Ahmed M Hussien, Marwa A Ibrahim, Khaled Y Farroh

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Adverse Effect of Metallic Gold and Silver Nanoparticles onNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Toxicity of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs): A review.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eman I HassanenDepartment of Pathology, Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Eman A MorsyDepartment of Poultry Diseases, Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Ahmed M HussienDepartment of Toxicology and Forensic Medicine, Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt.
Marwa A IbrahimDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Khaled Y FarrohDepartment of Nanotechnology, Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt.
Cairo University · EGAgricultural Research Center · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate what dosage of gold nanoparticles (GNPs) would improve growth performance, antioxidant levels and immune defense in broiler chickens. The experiment was carried out on 90 one-day-old mixbred Cobb chicks. The birds were allocated into three groups with three replicates. Group (1) kept as a negative control. Groups (2) and (3) received 5, 15 ppm GNPs via drinking water weekly for 35 days of chicks' life. Blood samples were collected at 8, 15, 22 and 36 days for oxidative stress evaluations and immunological studies. The birds were slaughtered at the ages of 36 days and thymus, spleen, busa of Fabricius and liver were collected for histopathological description, RT-PCR analysis and DNA fragmentation assay. Our results confirmed that adding of 15ppm GNPs in drinking water were induced remarkable blood oxidative stress damage, histopathological alterations, up-regulation of IL-6, Nrf2 gene expression, and DNA fragmentation in the examined immune organs of the broiler chickens as well as a significant reduction in the antibody titer against Newcastle (ND) and avian influenza (AI) viruses were noticed. On the other hand, the group received 5 ppm GNPs noticed better growth performance with the enhancement of the final food conversion ratio (FCR) without any significant difference in the previous toxicological and immunological parameters compared with the control groups. We suggest that feeding of 5ppm GNPs could improve the antioxidant capacity, immunity and performance in poultry but further food quality assurance tests are required in the future to confirm its safety for people.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimalsChickensDietFemaleGoldMaleMetal NanoparticlesWeight GainGoldgene expressiongold nanoparticleshistopathologyinflammationperformance

Identifiers

PMID32124930
PMCPMC7103588
OpenAlexW3010044113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.