Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32124568›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2020

Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures Through Different Short Segment Pedicle Screw Fixation Techniques: A Finite Element Analysis.

Tie-Nan Wang, Bao-Lin Wu, Rui-Meng Duan, Ya-Shuai Yuan, Ming-Jia Qu, Shuo Zhang, Wei Huang, Tao Liu, Xiao-Bing Yu

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Design and radiological confirmation of three-column cortical bone trajectory in the lower thoracic vertebrae.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tie-Nan WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, China.
Bao-Lin WuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, China.
Rui-Meng DuanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, China.
Ya-Shuai YuanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, China.
Ming-Jia QuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, China.
Shuo ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, China.
Wei HuangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, China.
Tao LiuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, China.
Xiao-Bing YuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6559-2938
Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the von Mises stresses of the pedicle screw system and the displacement of injured vertebrae using 3-D finite element analysis, and to evaluate the curative effect of the pedicle screw system.

methodsFinite element methods were used for biomechanical comparison of four posterior short segment pedicle screw fixation techniques. The different pedicle screw models are traditional trajectory (TT), Universal Spine System (USS), cortical bone trajectory (CBT), and CBT at the cranial level and pedicle screw (PS) at the caudal level (UP-CBT). The stress distribution of the screws and connecting rods under different working conditions and the displacement of the injured vertebrae were compared and analyzed.

resultsAfter the pedicle screw system was fixed, the stress under vertical compression was mainly concentrated at the proximal end of the screw, while the stress was mainly concentrated on the connecting rod during flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation. The TT group had the greatest stress during the flexion, extension, and left and right rotation. The UP-CBT group was most stressed when the left and right sides were flexed; the stress of the USS screw system was less than that of the other three models during flexion, lateral flexion, and rotation. The maximum von Mises stress values of pedicle screws in all exercise states were 556.2, 340.7, 458.1, and 533.4 MPa, respectively. In the USS group, the displacement of the injured vertebra was small in the flexion, and the left and right lateral flexion and the right rotation were higher than in the TT group and the CBT group. The maximum displacements of the injured vertebrae in all motion states were 1.679, 1.604, 1.752, and 1.777 mm, respectively.

conclusionUniversal Spine System pedicle screws are relatively less stressed under different working conditions, the risk of breakage is small, and the model is relatively stable; CBT screws do not exhibit better mechanical properties than conventional pedicle screws and USS pedicle screws.

Indexed as

Finite Element AnalysisPedicle ScrewsAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFracture Fixation, InternalHealthy VolunteersHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleSpinal FracturesThoracic VertebraeFinite element analysisPedicle screw systemThoracolumbar fracture

Identifiers

PMID32124568
PMCPMC7189051
OpenAlexW3010221523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.