ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2020
Perceptions of Insulin Pen Use and Technique in Black and Hispanic/Latino Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: a Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunogenicity and Efficacy of Insulin Glargine Biosimilar Ezelin versus Originator Insulin Glargine in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2021Article
- The burden of type 2 diabetes pre-and during the COVID-19 pandemic - a review.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2020Article
- Diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic: A global call to reconnect with patients and emphasize lifestyle changes and optimize glycemic and blood pressure control.Journal of diabetes · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesNon-Hispanic Blacks (NHB) and Hispanic/Latinos (H/L) are affected disproportionately by type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and its complications due to a myriad of reasons. Lack of diabetes education has been identified as one risk factor for poorly controlled diabetes. For persons using insulin, poor insulin administration technique can be problematic. Previous studies done demonstrating this have not been inclusive of NHB and H/L populations. As a result, this study aimed to use semi-structured interviews to examine insulin pen technique and training experience in NHB and H/L inpatients with T2DM.
designSemi-structured interviews comprised open- and close-ended questions, and prompts were conducted until reaching saturation in NHB and H/L inpatients with at least 3 months of insulin pen use. Data was analyzed by two researchers who completed a thematic analysis.
resultsTwenty semi-structured interviews were completed. Two major themes emerged from analysis included: patients prefer the insulin pen to syringes and vials and most had a lack of formal pen technique teaching.
conclusionAlthough the insulin pen is a preferred modality of insulin delivery, this sampling of disparity patients demonstrates that insulin pen technique should be continually reassessed by health care providers as majority of the patients never had formal insulin pen teaching. Among those who did have training, they still made errors such as not priming the pen or shortened dwell time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.