Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32124285›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

Comparison between UVA- and zero-valent iron-activated persulfate processes for degrading propylparaben.

Priscila H Palharim, Cátia A L Graça, Antonio C S C Teixeira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Priscila H PalharimResearch Group in Advanced Oxidation Processes (AdOx), Department of Chemical Engineering, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Luciano Gualberto, 380, tv 3, São Paulo, 05508-900, Brazil. ppalharim@usp.br.
Cátia A L GraçaLaboratory of Separation and Reaction Engineering - Laboratory of Catalysis and Materials (LSRE-LCM), Departamento de Engenharia Química, Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade do Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465, Porto, Portugal. catiaalgraca@fe.up.pt.
Antonio C S C TeixeiraResearch Group in Advanced Oxidation Processes (AdOx), Department of Chemical Engineering, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Luciano Gualberto, 380, tv 3, São Paulo, 05508-900, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade do Porto · PT

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (BR) 131467/2017-4Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2013/50218-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional wastewater treatments are not efficient in removing parabens, which may thus end up in surface waters, posing a threat to aquatic biota and human health. As an alternative treatment, persulfate (PS)-driven advanced oxidation technologies have gained growing attention for removing these pollutants. In this study, the degradation of propylparaben (PrP) by UVA- and zero-valent iron (ZVI)-activated persulfate was investigated. The effects of initial PS concentration ([PS]

Indexed as

IronWater Pollutants, ChemicalChromatography, LiquidOxidation-ReductionParabensTandem Mass SpectrometryIronParabenspropylparabenWater Pollutants, ChemicalDoehlert designPersulfatePropylparabenRadical scavengersToxicity predictionUVA radiationZero-valent iron

Identifiers

PMID32124285
OpenAlexW3009530891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.