Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32124266›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2020

Identifying Drugs Inducing Prematurity by Mining Claims Data with High-Dimensional Confounder Score Strategies.

Romain Demailly, Sylvie Escolano, Françoise Haramburu, Pascale Tubert-Bitter, Ismaïl Ahmed

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Romain DemaillyUniversité Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Université Paris-Sud, Inserm, High-Dimensional Biostatistics for Drug Safety and Genomics, CESP, Villejuif, France. romain.demailly@inserm.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1711-236X
Sylvie EscolanoUniversité Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Université Paris-Sud, Inserm, High-Dimensional Biostatistics for Drug Safety and Genomics, CESP, Villejuif, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0864-4321
Françoise HaramburuCentre de Pharmacovigilance, CHU de Bordeaux, Université de Bordeaux, UMR 1219, Bordeaux, France.
Pascale Tubert-BitterUniversité Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Université Paris-Sud, Inserm, High-Dimensional Biostatistics for Drug Safety and Genomics, CESP, Villejuif, France.
Ismaïl AhmedUniversité Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Université Paris-Sud, Inserm, High-Dimensional Biostatistics for Drug Safety and Genomics, CESP, Villejuif, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0468-6858

Funding

Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé AAP-2014-033Institut de Recherche en Santé Publique (FR) 17-PREV-49
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnant women are largely exposed to medications. However, knowledge is lacking about their effects on pregnancy and the fetus.

objectiveThis study sought to evaluate the potential of high-dimensional propensity scores and high-dimensional disease risk scores for automated signal detection in pregnant women from medico-administrative databases in the context of drug-induced prematurity.

methodsWe used healthcare claims and hospitalization discharges of a 1/97th representative sample of the French population. We tested the association between prematurity and drug exposure during the trimester before delivery, for all drugs prescribed to at least five pregnancies. We compared different strategies (1) for building the two scores, including two machine-learning methods and (2) to account for these scores in the final logistic regression models: adjustment, weighting, and matching. We also proposed a new signal detection criterion derived from these scores: the p value relative decrease. Evaluation was performed by assessing the relevance of the signals using a literature review and clinical expertise.

resultsScreening 400 drugs from a cohort of 57,407 pregnancies, we observed that choosing between the two machine-learning methods had little impact on the generated signals. Score adjustment performed better than weighting and matching. Using the p value relative decrease efficiently filtered out spurious signals while maintaining a number of relevant signals similar to score adjustment. Most of the relevant signals belonged to the psychotropic class with benzodiazepines, antidepressants, and antipsychotics.

conclusionsMining complex healthcare databases with statistical methods from the high-dimensional inference field may improve signal detection in pregnant women.

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesDatabases, FactualData MiningDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleFranceHospitalizationHumansMachine LearningPregnancyPremature BirthPropensity ScorePsychotropic DrugsPsychotropic Drugs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.