Observational studyInternational urology and nephrology2020
Residual kidney function in nocturnal vs conventional haemodialysis patients: a prospective observational study.
Observational study in International urology and nephrology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResidual kidney function (RKF) provides substantial volume and solute clearance even after dialysis initiation. Preservation of RKF is associated with improved outcomes including mortality in patients on both peritoneal and haemodialysis (HD). Factors predicting RKF loss are unclear, including HD modality. Nocturnal haemodialysis (NHD) may result in less aggressive fluid and solute shifts, however, retrospective data suggests frequent NHD may accelerate RKF decline. The aim of the study was to determine if decline in RKF differs between patients undergoing conventional haemodialysis (CHD) versus NHD.
methodsA prospective observational study of incident HD patients was undertaken comparing patients undertaking CHD (4-5 h, 3 days/week) and NHD (8 h, 3-5 nights/week). Change in RKF was measured by urea and creatinine clearance (48-h interdialytic urine collection) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (Cr51-EDTA nuclear scan) at initiation of dialysis (baseline) and 12 months.
resultsA total of 18 incident HD patients were recruited (8 CHD, 10 NHD). Three patients withdrew after baseline (n = 15). Baseline RKF was similar between groups with mean nuclear GFR of 13.3 ± 4.1 mL/min in the CHD cohort vs 13.5 ± 4.6 mL/min in the NHD group (p = 0.89). Baseline urine volume was 2399 ± 950 mLs and 2794 ± 1662 mLs in the CHD and NHD, respectively (p = 0.57). Nuclear GFR declined from time 0 to 12 months to 9.3 ± 2.5 mL/min and 10.4 ± 4.3 mL/min in the CHD and NHD, respectively (p = 0.52). There was a significant decline in 48-h urine volume over 12 months with a mean volume of 1943 ± 1087.0 mLs in the CHD compared to 601.7 ± 315.3 mLs in the NHD (p = 0.01). No significant difference was found in other measures of RKF between groups over 12 months.
conclusionThis small prospective cohort study found that the loss of residual urine volume was greater in the NHD vs the CHD cohort but there was no difference in other measures of RKF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.