Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32124225›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2020

DeepSurvNet: deep survival convolutional network for brain cancer survival rate classification based on histopathological images.

Amin Zadeh Shirazi, Eric Fornaciari, Narjes Sadat Bagherian, Lisa M Ebert, Barbara Koszyca, Guillermo A Gomez

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Amin Zadeh ShiraziCentre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and University of South Australia, UniSA CRI Building, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia. amin.zadeh_shirazi@mymail.unisa.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1906-9900
Eric FornaciariDepartment of Mathematics of Computation, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Narjes Sadat BagherianDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Lisa M EbertCentre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and University of South Australia, UniSA CRI Building, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8041-9666
Barbara KoszycaSA Pathology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
Guillermo A GomezCentre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and University of South Australia, UniSA CRI Building, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia. Guillermo.Gomez@unisa.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0494-2404
South Australia Pathology · AUMashhad University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Australian Research Council Future Fellowship FT160100366Cancer Council SA Beat Cancer Project Infrastructure GrantCure Brain Cancer Foundation 150National Health and Medical Research Council 1067405National Health and Medical Research Council 1123816
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histopathological whole slide images of haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained biopsies contain valuable information with relation to cancer disease and its clinical outcomes. Still, there are no highly accurate automated methods to correlate histolopathological images with brain cancer patients' survival, which can help in scheduling patients therapeutic treatment and allocate time for preclinical studies to guide personalized treatments. We now propose a new classifier, namely, DeepSurvNet powered by deep convolutional neural networks, to accurately classify in 4 classes brain cancer patients' survival rate based on histopathological images (class I, 0-6 months; class II, 6-12 months; class III, 12-24 months; and class IV, >24 months survival after diagnosis). After training and testing of DeepSurvNet model on a public brain cancer dataset, The Cancer Genome Atlas, we have generalized it using independent testing on unseen samples. Using DeepSurvNet, we obtained precisions of 0.99 and 0.8 in the testing phases on the mentioned datasets, respectively, which shows DeepSurvNet is a reliable classifier for brain cancer patients' survival rate classification based on histopathological images. Finally, analysis of the frequency of mutations revealed differences in terms of frequency and type of genes associated to each class, supporting the idea of a different genetic fingerprint associated to patient survival. We conclude that DeepSurvNet constitutes a new artificial intelligence tool to assess the survival rate in brain cancer. Graphical abstract A DCNN model was generated to accurately predict survival rates of brain cancer patients (classified in 4 different classes) accurately. After training the model using images from H&E stained tissue biopsies from The Cancer Genome Atlas database (TCGA, left), the model can predict for each patient, based on a histological image (top right), its survival class accurately (bottom right).

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerBrain NeoplasmsDeep LearningHistocytochemistryHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSurvival AnalysisBrain cancerClassificationConvolutional neural networksDeep learningHistopathological imagesSurvival rate

Identifiers

PMID32124225
PMCPMC7188709
OpenAlexW3010168554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.